Let's compare... Post your pictures. ONLY f1.2 and below!

110142331.jpg


Noctilux / KB400
 
so many technical show offs, so few interesting images (whose vast majority could have been taken with other equipment as well).
But this is the nature of this forum, and I like looking at it all the same
 
really enjoying this thread,used to love my om1,2,always wanted that f1.2 for it but it wasnt to be.now I regret it even more.really nice work from everyone,even though it might turn out to be expensive.......Neil
 
I feel somewhat reassured by the fact that people seem to like the look of the 1.2 Zuiko ... it was a bit of a rush of blood when I bought it and to be honest I use the 1.4 50mm I have a lot more as over all I think it's the better lens.

Having that speed and rather dizzying at times bokeh is enhanced by being able to focus down to .4 of a metre. This was a toy bear inside a plastic case in a near totally dark room at maximum aperture at minimum distance with Tri-x at 3200 ... it was very dark! 😛



tx3200_4R.jpg
 
Last edited:
0.4?! ok thats it. Im getting one new system now.😉 hope to find a minty set...

heres one from the .95 on mp:
3382480306_18fe259141.jpg


Keith said:
I feel somewhat reassured by the fact that people seem to like the look of the 1.2 Zuiko ... it was a bit of a rush of blood when I bought it and to be honest I use the 1.4 50mm I have a lot more as over all I think it's the better lens.

Having that speed and rather dizzying at times bokeh is enhanced by being able to focus down to .4 of a metre. This was a toy bear inside a plastic case in a near totally dark room at maximum aperture at minimum distance with Tri-x at 3200 ... it was very dark! 😛
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom