Let's see some 8x11 (mm) photos!

jpchopper

Member
Local time
11:26 PM
Joined
Jul 5, 2019
Messages
17
Looking to see some examples!

Lacking a proper film scanner, I've been getting decent results using a smartphone, with either a Minox slide viewer, or a 20x clip on macro.
I'm decently happy with my results, but if anyone knows a scanner that's exceptional, please do let me know! (Thinking about a Canoscan 9000F atm)

Anyway. Here's some of my favorites.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
fd71e82c187aac47afc226f6b563d3d6.jpg
1c4b9659cbcc408a204a50942a2a1729.jpg
2e20634a27338b7199f6881fe09437a2.jpg
2f12c9fbcf56d19ebad3a1acbcf104cc.jpg
d70e26dbd28b5b525caefd966b862022.jpg
9bcde964e370a760e50e7508298e6f42.jpg
4ff27c2fbb78a2196ce77b301c30f222.jpg
53777640451bedfeabcd0ce17f20df09.jpg
a4e06e1776b96e11ab997219d773668e.jpg
 
Pretty cool! I'd go the DSLR scanning route. There are several threads on the topic. For the tiny negs, you'd need bellows and normal macro or maybe a wide angle. Should give you much better resolution than any scanner short of drum scanning. And I think nicely resolved, prominent and sharp grain is the real attraction of the format.
 
Pretty cool! I'd go the DSLR scanning route. There are several threads on the topic. For the tiny negs, you'd need bellows and normal macro or maybe a wide angle. Should give you much better resolution than any scanner short of drum scanning. And I think nicely resolved, prominent and sharp grain is the real attraction of the format.
Thanks! At some point that may be the route I take, for sure; for the moment though, DSLRs are in unicorn territory for my budget. I'll pounce when the right opportunity comes along.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 
Thanks! At some point that may be the route I take, for sure; for the moment though, DSLRs are in unicorn territory for my budget. I'll pounce when the right opportunity comes along.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

An older DSLR or mirrorless and bellows and cobbling together something to hold the negatives will be cheaper AND better for this than a half-decent scanner. Remember that with these tiny negatives, you can only use a fraction of the resolution that a 35mm scanner provides, but with the right lens all the resolution of digital camera.
 
I've done a lot of Minox 8x11mm photography over the years. 🙂

Even a 4000 ppi scanner will only net lowish resolution photographs from Minox 8x11mm negatives: a 4000 ppi scan of an 8x11 negative nets a 1260x1732 pixel image, about 2.2 Pixels. Printed at 240 ppi, that nets an image area of 5.25 x 7.25 inches, and the negative better be very sharp and clean for it to look good.

I switched to a 24 Mpixel copy camera setup. This is the Leica SL I used to use, with Leica Focusing Bellows-R and Summicron-R 50mm lens to do Minox negatives:

24075397171_937e1cd767_o.jpg


This setup nets enough magnification to obtain a 21-22 mpixel digital image that you can do a lot with.

24157999585_9a2a712944_o.jpg


23862367600_4c8982e46c_o.jpg


23876358711_73bc8e1af8_o.jpg


You can see the difference in quality instantly between these photos and two older scans made with a Nikon CoolScan V ED negative scanner:

4725525013_9ea4141dee_o.jpg


4725524653_e8d0d924f3_o.jpg


4726171698_6a01c46931_o.jpg


I've now switched to using a Leica CL setup, same lens and bellows as above. This has advantages over the SL for this kind of work ... the CL's smaller format has the same pixel resolution as the SL (24 Mpixel) so the amount of magnification required to capture a Minox negative is quite a bit lower, which means less potential for vibration, etc, and the output is equal in pixel count and quality.

So if capturing Minox negatives is a goal, I'd pick a good used mirrorless camera with an adapted 50-60 mm macro lens. A good tripod or copy stand, and a clean light source, will make the job go quickly and consistently.

G
 
An older DSLR or mirrorless and bellows and cobbling together something to hold the negatives will be cheaper AND better for this than a half-decent scanner. Remember that with these tiny negatives, you can only use a fraction of the resolution that a 35mm scanner provides, but with the right lens all the resolution of digital camera.
That's kinda what I'm doing with the macro and my phone, I'm getting approx 8-12 Mp "scans" but I need to clean up the process a bit for flatter negatives. Until I can swing A DSLR...

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 
Again, phone scans.
Locomotive on Minopan 25, Minox fine grain developer. Minox B.
Generator shed in the desert: Bluefire Police film, Bluefire HR developer. Minox IIIS.
Kids in waiting room: Ektachrome 100, Arista E6, Minox TLX.
Birdhouse, flowers, son with ice cream and dinosaur: Velvia 50, Minox TLX

20x clip on macro, Pixel2XL for "scans"
4b2513a2bec832a4e4868b2324d8dc61.jpg
5427d398cb07a9b746113878876aeabd.jpg
867dd10b39b8097197c8860e7e3a8975.jpg
e08eddf0eef97a4fef38b35f027f10cd.jpg
f9fdd795c0146647e90222cd61ab1e6d.jpg
9a05a61aab31f286eac6524f9164be37.jpg


Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 
Some shots with a Yashica Atoron electro (also 8x11mm format)
Kodak Ektachrome 100
Arista E6
Phone scan (through macro lens)

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
f21c751c1273b108002e27ad482956a5.jpg
9388cb24b2ce21a165855442804c7819.jpg
b38cc38ebba02eff8f0724898c35c711.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom