craygc
Well-known
Melbourne...

viridari
Photon Recovery Agent
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ricoh GR
ISO 1000, f/8.0, 1/500
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Ricoh GR
ISO 1000, f/8.0, 1/500

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
j.scooter
Veteran
j.scooter
Veteran
j.scooter
Veteran
PatrickT
New Rangefinder User
This one is so good!
j.scooter
Veteran
Much Thanks Patrick!
pesphoto
Veteran
Cherry blossom bomb (by Ricoh GR2)





nightfly
Well-known
sevres_babylone
Veteran
Nice one! ...
shawn
Veteran

GR3
Shawn
nightfly
Well-known
maggieo
More Deadly
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Got the GRIII in and am loving it. Seems to be much better highlight recovery on this sensor than any other sensor I've used.




nightfly
Well-known
Good to hear as this was not the strong suit of the previous model.
Got the GRIII in and am loving it. Seems to be much better highlight recovery on this sensor than any other sensor I've used.
retinax
Well-known
Got the GRIII in and am loving it. Seems to be much better highlight recovery on this sensor than any other sensor I've used.
If there's much room for recovery, doesn't that just mean that the standard profile in Lightroom or whatever you're using doesn't make good use of the dynamic range, rather than being a property of the sensor? If the sensor has great dynamic range, that's wonderful in any case.
The tonality in the third one looks off, is that what happens with a lot of highlight recovery or just the fluorescent surfaces and interesting light?
And there seems to be a little more barrel distortion than on the old APS-C models, yes? No big deal of course.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
If there's much room for recovery, doesn't that just mean that the standard profile in Lightroom or whatever you're using doesn't make good use of the dynamic range, rather than being a property of the sensor? If the sensor has great dynamic range, that's wonderful in any case.
The tonality in the third one looks off, is that what happens with a lot of highlight recovery or just the fluorescent surfaces and interesting light?
And there seems to be a little more barrel distortion than on the old APS-C models, yes? No big deal of course.
I'm using Camera Raw and Photoshop CC 2019, and have not yet looked at a profile, I tend to work on images individually from the RAW file in Camera Raw. As for correcting the distortion - I never actually found a need for that with the ii, but you're right, there is more distortion here. The vignetting removal in camera doesn't totally even out the corners either.
My main niggle is the rear toggle switch for exposure compensation - it is always active unlike with how I have had the previous models set-up - so carrying the camera around the neck tends to allow my belly to set a compensation unbeknownst to the brain. I've been checking that, but have wildly underexposed several quick grabs because of this.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.