tbarker13
shooter of stuff
So I picked this lens up a few months back and sent it to Brian for his attention. I didn't shoot a lot with it until two weeks back, when my other 50mm lens was out of commission. So the J3 went out on my M8 for a couple portrait sessions.
The lens performed quite well, I think.
These were all shot at ISO 640, f.4 or f.5.6.
The lens performed quite well, I think.
These were all shot at ISO 640, f.4 or f.5.6.



elshaneo
Panographer
Great Portraits. I like very much the first one 
GoneSavage
not actually
Who needs Leica? Who needs Zeiss?
Beautiful photographs of a beautiful subject!
And it's very satisfying to see a J-3 in action after working on it.
We did need Zeiss to develop the Sonnar, that the J-3 is based on...
And it's very satisfying to see a J-3 in action after working on it.
We did need Zeiss to develop the Sonnar, that the J-3 is based on...
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I'm starting to really see some kudos in having a good J3 for portraits, those shots are really nice ... I have one but it's on my Kiev and as much as I like the lens I can't get too excited about the Kiev!
A question for Brian ... can my J3 be converted to LTM or am I better off looking for another J3?
I aplogise to the OP for using your thread to ask Brian this question!
A question for Brian ... can my J3 be converted to LTM or am I better off looking for another J3?
I aplogise to the OP for using your thread to ask Brian this question!
The Kiev and LTM Optics Modules for the J-3 are identical. I have used J-3 optics modules in Zeiss Contax mounts left over from my Sonnar LTM conversions.
The best J-3's are from the 1950s. And the one shown is one of the nicest that I've seen.
The best J-3's are from the 1950s. And the one shown is one of the nicest that I've seen.
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
Thanks guys.
I know this might seem odd to some, but I like this lens enough that I'm on the verge of selling my 50 pre-asph lux. I'm not suggesting the J-3 is superior to the lux. But particularly for these types of portraits, this tiny little lens is doing everything I could ask. And at a heck of a lot cheaper price.
I know this might seem odd to some, but I like this lens enough that I'm on the verge of selling my 50 pre-asph lux. I'm not suggesting the J-3 is superior to the lux. But particularly for these types of portraits, this tiny little lens is doing everything I could ask. And at a heck of a lot cheaper price.
raid
Dad Photographer
I'm starting to really see some kudos in having a good J3 for portraits, those shots are really nice ... I have one but it's on my Kiev and as much as I like the lens I can't get too excited about the Kiev!
A question for Brian ... can my J3 be converted to LTM or am I better off looking for another J3?
I aplogise to the OP for using your thread to ask Brian this question!![]()
Keith,
I got the Amedeo adapter, and now I can use any Contax mount lenses [such as the J-3] on any leica camera. It also allows me to find J-3 lenses cheaper.
raid
Dad Photographer
The Kiev and LTM Optics Modules for the J-3 are identical. I have used J-3 optics modules in Zeiss Contax mounts left over from my Sonnar LTM conversions.
The best J-3's are from the 1950s. And the one shown is one of the nicest that I've seen.
Brian,
I am expecting for Christmas two J-3's from the early 1950's! I will send them to you to be optimized.
raid
Dad Photographer
Guys ... just realize that buying a J-3 does not imply you will have such women for models! Calm down.
Last edited:
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
Guys ... just realize that buying a J-3 does not imply you will have such a woman for a model! Calm down.
And just for the record, these are actually two different women.
raid
Dad Photographer
And just for the record, these are actually two different women.![]()
Of course, you are right Tim. I corrected my statement above.
oftheherd
Veteran
Guys ... just realize that buying a J-3 does not imply you will have such women for models! Calm down.
Thanks Raid for letting us know. You just saved me a lot of money on the purchase of a J3. I am a little disappointed nonetheless.
Raid- you have three beautiful models. And two work for Ice Cream...
raid
Dad Photographer
Thanks Raid for letting us know. You just saved me a lot of money on the purchase of a J3. I am a little disappointed nonetheless.![]()
![]()
![]()
I am expecting two J-3's soon, so maybe I am "cheating" here!
raid
Dad Photographer
Raid- you have three beautiful models. And two work for Ice Cream...
Brian,
Their demands increase each year. I better start saving for photo sessions.
raid
Dad Photographer
You're suggesting that the J-3 in LTM is even more expensive than the Contax-mount J-3?
Yes, Dan. The LTM J-3 are sold for about 25%-40% more than a Contax mount J-3. Eddy Smolov was told by a contact in Ukrania that "the LTM lenses are rare".
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
those photos are really appealing! I want one too! Brian, if I buy one from ebay, is it going to be similar result or it is your magic? 
I remember you were suggesting 1950s productions...
I remember you were suggesting 1950s productions...
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
those photos are really appealing! I want one too! Brian, if I buy one from ebay, is it going to be similar result or it is your magic?
I remember you were suggesting 1950s productions...
Thanks. I'm sure Brian will answer this himself, but when I was looking (and I sought his advice before I even started the search) it was my goal to find one from the 1950s. In the end, I think I got pretty lucky with mine. Can't remember the exact price, but it was close to $200.
Mr_Flibble
In Tabulas Argenteas Refero
I'm scanning some Adox 100 negatives taken with a J-3 on a Leica IIIc. Will post some later, if my scanner doesn't get any strange ideas
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.