Paul T.
Veteran
Dear experts,
The rangefinder patch on an M3, of which I've just taken delivery, seems to be to be very low contrast. I've appended photos below, sorry for the quality, which show the RF patch for the M3, and my CL. As you can see, on the M3 patch the secondary image is barely visible - you can just see the badge on the speaker cabinet, but you can't see the secondary image of the speaker itself, whereas it's clear on the CL RF patch. I have used just one M3 before, and the RF patch seemed infinitely superior to this; likewise, there is no comparison to the M4 which I owned until recently, and was very easy to focus.
So, my question: is the low contrast caused merely by dirt and haze in the finder? Or could there be a more serious cause like oxidation on the prism silvering, or balsam separation? If it's the latter, then I presume I'm looking at around $250 for a rf restoration at crr - who also have a long waiting list - which would be uneconomical with a DS M3 like this one, although in other respects it seems a fine example.
TIA
These photos, poor as they are, give a pretty accurate impression of what you can see thru the viewfinder...
M3 viewfinder
CL viewfinder, for comparison...
The rangefinder patch on an M3, of which I've just taken delivery, seems to be to be very low contrast. I've appended photos below, sorry for the quality, which show the RF patch for the M3, and my CL. As you can see, on the M3 patch the secondary image is barely visible - you can just see the badge on the speaker cabinet, but you can't see the secondary image of the speaker itself, whereas it's clear on the CL RF patch. I have used just one M3 before, and the RF patch seemed infinitely superior to this; likewise, there is no comparison to the M4 which I owned until recently, and was very easy to focus.
So, my question: is the low contrast caused merely by dirt and haze in the finder? Or could there be a more serious cause like oxidation on the prism silvering, or balsam separation? If it's the latter, then I presume I'm looking at around $250 for a rf restoration at crr - who also have a long waiting list - which would be uneconomical with a DS M3 like this one, although in other respects it seems a fine example.
TIA
These photos, poor as they are, give a pretty accurate impression of what you can see thru the viewfinder...
M3 viewfinder
CL viewfinder, for comparison...
Last edited: