M4-P (slight) light leak?

Local time
7:59 AM
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
17
Hey folks,

Wondering if anyone here can help me out.

Not too long ago I sent out my M4-P to have its light seals replaced; something that was recommended after my images were coming out with faint halo-ing at the top and bottom edges (halo can be seen on the left and right side of the attached image). Though it seems like the halo effect is slightly more faint since the repair, it hasn't gone completely away. My repair tech was nearly certain that the leak was not coming from the back door, but due to where the light leak is located on the negative it seems like it might be a possibility. Anyone have any ideas of what may be causing this?

I'm developing at home, and scanning with a Nikon Coolscan LS-40 + Vuescan. (I've heard that the Coolscan scanners can have issues with light reflecting within, so I'm wondering if that could be a potential cause as well.)
 

Attachments

  • 41646009785_759fd46429.jpg
    41646009785_759fd46429.jpg
    155.8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Have you examined the negative itself? That would determine if your scanner is the cause.

You may find the filmlabapp.com smartphone app useful for this, as it reverses the negative image.
 
Have you examined the negative itself? That would determine if your scanner is the cause.

You may find the filmlabapp.com smartphone app useful for this, as it reverses the negative image.

I typically take photos of my negatives with my phone prior to scanning and invert the image using PS actions I set up in PS express to check for any major errors. The halo effect isn't prominent enough to be noticeable on my phone, but becomes evident once I do a proper scan of the negative.
 
What happens if you load the negative into the scanner flipped, so that you get the "halo side" to the right? Just an idea to see if the scanner itself accentuates the halo.

Another idea is to expose one or two frames with a lens cap on to see if you have a light leak somewhere.
 
I see the 'effect' at the left AND right side...

The negative is buried somewhere among my binders, so it would be hard to fish out. I have a roll I'm scanning at home so I may post comparison shots (negative vs scan) tomorrow for any images in which the halo appears. For the time being, I've attached a not so great snapshot of the negative I took while it was drying. I've also attached another image which has less of the halo effect (see the bottom right corner and the left side) along with a clearer picture of that negative.
 

Attachments

  • 45766947994_37a62d23d7.jpg
    45766947994_37a62d23d7.jpg
    47.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 45766947974_5c4fe4ed47.jpg
    45766947974_5c4fe4ed47.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 0
  • 40739472720_01ba1904f1.jpg
    40739472720_01ba1904f1.jpg
    153.9 KB · Views: 0
What happens if you load the negative into the scanner flipped, so that you get the "halo side" to the right? Just an idea to see if the scanner itself accentuates the halo.

Another idea is to expose one or two frames with a lens cap on to see if you have a light leak somewhere.

I'll give that a try the next time the halo shows up, which will more than likely be during the roll I'm currently scanning.

Also planning to do that second suggestion along with checking the curtain with a flashlight in a dark room now that I just finished up a roll and the camera is empty.
 
coupla questions. a) presume you've been processing before and had no problems ? b) if not, could be agitation issues. can't see how it could be light leaks if you're getting it at top and bottom of frame.
 
coupla questions. a) presume you've been processing before and had no problems ? b) if not, could be agitation issues. can't see how it could be light leaks if you're getting it at top and bottom of frame.

If film is agitated by the stick, not by rotation of entire developing tank, I have seen something similar.
 
Update + new examples:
I spoke to my repair tech and he believes A.) that these are light leaks and that B.) doubling up on the internal light shields should solve the problem. I'm going to develop another roll over the weekend and switch up my agitation methodology to see if that makes any kind of difference. If the problem persists I will be sending the camera back to him for some additional tinkering.
 

Attachments

  • 46441883762_857fc60159.jpg
    46441883762_857fc60159.jpg
    135.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 46441884382_f98d1b488f.jpg
    46441884382_f98d1b488f.jpg
    131.7 KB · Views: 0
Back
Top Bottom