willie_901
Veteran
Good plan!
I'd guess those who recharge are in the minority.
I'd guess those who recharge are in the minority.
Corran
Well-known
I would wager it will last much longer than a "few additional years".
I sure hope so. My D700 is still clicking away and is coming up to being 10 years old. Shutter count is well past 125,000. It looks like junk as half the rubber body cover is lifting off but whatever. I know electronics won't last forever but less than 10 years on a digital camera would make me a bit upset.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
I doubt whether that is relevant. The Leica M series cameras are AFAIK the only ones to use coating in IR filtering. Other cameras use an IR filter that is laminated with inert glass.Of course "All Organic molecules by all means do not readily react with water". This is particularly true at normal temperatures and pressures. In fact, there are millions of digital cameras with IR filter layers that do not spontaneously react with water. Many of these have slightly thicker IR filter layers than the original M9 sensor assembly.
The reason is that the high angle of incidence of light from rangefinder lenses does not combine with a thick IR filter.
willie_901
Veteran
Good points.
As far as I know IR filter materials are suspended in their own film layer. Additional glass lamination would be bad because more glass layers can affect optical quality. At any rate, it would have been more accurate if I wrote sensor assembly cover-glass thickness. Mea culpa.
Thickness is also important to non M-mount cameras as well. Here's a technical paper that discusses how reduced pixel size requires thinner color-filter materials (see Section 5). The color-filter array thickness affects the signal levels.
The CFA might, or might not, be physically separate from the the sensor-assembly cover glass. Regardless the total thickness of optics in front of the photo-diode bed is important.
Warning: Even more thread hijack info below!
Figures 2 and 3 in the above paper describes how the CFA frequency selectivity (color error) can affect the analog signal-to-noise ratio. For older CFA materials, higher color-error levels increase S/N. Higher color error may also affect Bayer rendering because the Bayer model assumes pure R, G and B light. Minimizing demosaicing algorithm complexity (simpler color-error, compensation parameters) could result in better rendering aesthetics.
Figure 5 is relevant to CCD vs CMOS discussions that bubble up from time to time.
I doubt whether that is relevant. The Leica M series cameras are AFAIK the only ones to use coating in IR filtering. Other cameras use an IR filter that is laminated with inert glass.
As far as I know IR filter materials are suspended in their own film layer. Additional glass lamination would be bad because more glass layers can affect optical quality. At any rate, it would have been more accurate if I wrote sensor assembly cover-glass thickness. Mea culpa.
The reason is that the high angle of incidence of light from rangefinder lenses does not combine with a thick IR filter.
Thickness is also important to non M-mount cameras as well. Here's a technical paper that discusses how reduced pixel size requires thinner color-filter materials (see Section 5). The color-filter array thickness affects the signal levels.
The CFA might, or might not, be physically separate from the the sensor-assembly cover glass. Regardless the total thickness of optics in front of the photo-diode bed is important.
Warning: Even more thread hijack info below!
Figures 2 and 3 in the above paper describes how the CFA frequency selectivity (color error) can affect the analog signal-to-noise ratio. For older CFA materials, higher color-error levels increase S/N. Higher color error may also affect Bayer rendering because the Bayer model assumes pure R, G and B light. Minimizing demosaicing algorithm complexity (simpler color-error, compensation parameters) could result in better rendering aesthetics.
Figure 5 is relevant to CCD vs CMOS discussions that bubble up from time to time.
Share: