M9 with B&W sensor?

totifoto

Well-known
Local time
7:28 PM
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
506
One thing is for sure: It will have a higher sensitivity due to the monochromatic version of the sensor.

$2500? Have a pleasant evening.. :)
 
Looks like Leica runs out of M9 sensors, and needs some cool replacement rather badly.
 
i'd love to have one, but $2,500 is a fantasy. If it isnt over $4,000, i'd be surprised...but also very interested!
 
I still do not believe anyone is going to make a digital camera without an LCD display.
But if this thing does happen, I'd guess you can take the current M9 price and add 20-30 percent to it. That should get you into the ballpark of a special edition B&W-only M9.
 
I still do not believe anyone is going to make a digital camera without an LCD display.
But if this thing does happen, I'd guess you can take the current M9 price and add 20-30 percent to it. That should get you into the ballpark of a special edition B&W-only M9.

:D :D :D (Possible though.. this is Leica!)
 
this rumor already circled around week or two ago. guess Leica needs to keep price high also because their production ability is low. too many orders on one go, and they would choke. if M9 b&w really is under works, it would make sense to strip crappy M9 LCD from it as well. kind of oddity in digital camera world that Leica only is capable making :p

edit: second thought about LCD. numerous camera variables would still have to be configured somehow + many users would want least histogram... hmm.
 
If one explores the B&W sensor that Phase one currently makes, and Leica builds a camera around a similar technology, a B&W M10 could be more revolutionary than evolutionary. Resolution would be very high because of the lack of all those color filtors, but the dynamic contrast range???

Also consider the possibility that a B&W only M10 would not make the M9 obsolete for those that want to shoot color, and this would be good marketing. Why create a IPAD that hurts computer sales like at Apple?

I know there's a lot of wishful thinking here on my part, but a B&W digital camera that would have close to medium format quality in a Leica package that used my M-mount glass to me would be a game changer: it would be my dream come true.

I'm hoping for a big surprise, and I hope it isn't the price. I'm thinking more than a M9P by a few K.

Cal
 
I seriously doubt we will see a digital camera with no screen.

And I even more seriously doubt we will see a new Leica under $6000.
 
A black and white sensor with no rear screen would match Leica's current business plan of continually marching back into the dark ages!
 
If one explores the B&W sensor that Phase one currently makes, and Leica builds a camera around a similar technology, a B&W M10 could be more revolutionary than evolutionary. Resolution would be very high because of the lack of all those color filtors, but the dynamic contrast range???
Cal

Cal, a CCD sensor, monochromatic or RGB-CFA, does not show any difference in resolution power. The only difference (say for the KAF-sensor used on the M9) would come out to be somewhat 10 times of sensitivity in lux compared to the color version, I can not estimate how this will be reflected to the SNR in dB terms. The DR might improve a little (or may remain the same) mostly due to the processor engine chosen.
 
I have hoped for such a camera for a while, but I always thought if it ever happened it would be from somewhere ilke Ricoh or Fuji. i doubt if I would be able to afford a Leica version.
Surely it would have better rez as it doesnt have to interpolate between the photo sites for colour - do the current ones not take the output from four sites to average the colour?
I know vertually nothing about sensor design so Im more than likly totally wrong!
 
Cal, a CCD sensor, monochromatic or RGB-CFA, does not show any difference in resolution power. The only difference (say for the KAF-sensor used on the M9) would come out to be somewhat 10 times of sensitivity in lux compared to the color version, I can not estimate how this will be reflected to the SNR in dB terms. The DR might improve a little (or may remain the same) mostly due to the processor engine chosen.

Bob,

My understanding might be wrong, but I understand it takes three pixels to make a color signal and the required filtering for color processing degrades the signal.

At home I have single ended triode monoblocks using a 300B vacuum tube for a stereo. Signal processing is a big factor. I'm assuming that signal processing in a B&W only sensor would be simple and more pure in a similar analog way to my audio where less is more.

Your explaination about sensitivity makes sense. and there's a lot of grey area that I'm hoping leads to other possibilities.

As I remember Phase One did a comparision between their B&W sensor and one of their much larger color sensors to compare remarkable resolution and make a statement about the jump in resolution. This lead me to believe that there is a possibility that making a more basic B&W only digital camera might have some real performance advantages.

Any help in further understand is greatly appreciated. I'm just an old film guy who doesn't even scan.

Cal
 
Wasn't the 1st April just over two weeks ago?

No one is going to pay more than for an M9 when they can have an M9 and have both colour and B+W. And what is B+W sensor anyway? One which is only sensitive to grey light? I'm gob smacked that people are taking any of this seriously.
 
Back
Top Bottom