xixi_gelly
Member
Like in many fields, there's one big name institution that attracts both outsized worship and criticism in photography and that would have to be Magnum.
Some may pooh-pooh it as struggling or, worse yet, increasingly irrelevant in today's changing media environment but to me, it represents a shining history and a commitment to all kinds of photographic excellence - spanning journalism to art - that I hope endures for a long, long time.
So I'm curious about the cooperative: I know the climate for editorial work is awful but how are its photographers faring right now? How is the agency as a whole doing? What are the commitments that photographers have to make in terms of paying dues? Does the agency share profits in a partnership structure? How does it compete against Getty, VII, Panos, Noor, Vu, etc?
And why do members sometimes leave?
Would appreciate whatever thoughts and knowledge you have on this institution, warts and all. First hand experience particularly welcome 😀
Some may pooh-pooh it as struggling or, worse yet, increasingly irrelevant in today's changing media environment but to me, it represents a shining history and a commitment to all kinds of photographic excellence - spanning journalism to art - that I hope endures for a long, long time.
So I'm curious about the cooperative: I know the climate for editorial work is awful but how are its photographers faring right now? How is the agency as a whole doing? What are the commitments that photographers have to make in terms of paying dues? Does the agency share profits in a partnership structure? How does it compete against Getty, VII, Panos, Noor, Vu, etc?
And why do members sometimes leave?
Would appreciate whatever thoughts and knowledge you have on this institution, warts and all. First hand experience particularly welcome 😀