R
ruben
Guest
Finally I got Maizenberg's book. WOW ! There is so much insinght about the issues we are daily discussing here that I will say for myself that I have been waisting so much time without it... what a pity and what a treasure !
I cannot strongly enough recommend this book for all of us. It has been written for our average knowledge. For us.
I doubt I will end reading this book some day as there are so much cameras highly detailed there, and my main interest is in the Kiev chapter. Since I am not exactly a technical minded person, it rather takes me time to read it, but every single sentence there is gold.
In general, I can say that much of our critics of Soviet stuff comes from plain ignorance about how should we operate it.
One example that I will address now is about the contax/kiev cassetes. I am addressing this just because it is among the first things he speaks about and I have been able to read meantime.
Maizenbergs analyses the differet types of existing cassetes and finally he seems to recommend (*) the use of the two-cylindred cassetes, the dedicated ones for Kievs and Contaxes. The reason ? several ones but the most important refers to a "new" factor, never taken into consideration by me. There is a certain amount of friction at the lips of the feeding cassete, that Kievs and Contaxes are built to accept.
We can assume that any commercial cassete is built below that ammount, for free feeding action, and there is nothing to worry about here. But this is not necessarily the situation with home loaded cassetes from bulk film. The great advantage of using the two cylindred original contax/kiev cassetes is in their opening upon camera closing, fully freeing the sprockets, and the whole shutter mechanism, from unnecessary load. Interesting, not?
Now, comming back to Maizenberg's book in general, we have to take into account this book was written by the early sixties, when the Kievs were relatively young cameras. The Kievs we buy today, are rather different in their condition, making the Kiev Project highly relevant. Furthermore at his time, it seems from the book there were a lot of fixers of these breed available, therefore some hard issues he recommends us to go there instead of doing it ourselves.
Nevertheless, my good fellows, no better investment than having this book. In the long term it will save us a lot of money and time. Again, again and again, ignorance is the mother of all evils.
Cheers,
Ruben
BTW, there is a kind of problem there when reading, in that you may be at page 289 for example, and he refers you again to a pic found at page 356 or 253 - this resulting into a very annoying proceeding.
But with the instruments available today, I have scanned all pics related to Kievs, then enlarged each one to A4 size, printed them and made an auxiliary second book of drawings, allowing me speedy finding, extraordinary size view, and the most important - I can continue reading page 289 and have besides the drawing found at page 356.
(*) Note I phrase myself "he seems to recommend", because interestingly he takes along his book great care in not saying 'this is better', in issues we daily take sides here at RFF.
When analysing the options, Maizenberg usually weights the different positive and negative sides of each thing, leving final judgement upon the reader. Great master.
I cannot strongly enough recommend this book for all of us. It has been written for our average knowledge. For us.
I doubt I will end reading this book some day as there are so much cameras highly detailed there, and my main interest is in the Kiev chapter. Since I am not exactly a technical minded person, it rather takes me time to read it, but every single sentence there is gold.
In general, I can say that much of our critics of Soviet stuff comes from plain ignorance about how should we operate it.
One example that I will address now is about the contax/kiev cassetes. I am addressing this just because it is among the first things he speaks about and I have been able to read meantime.
Maizenbergs analyses the differet types of existing cassetes and finally he seems to recommend (*) the use of the two-cylindred cassetes, the dedicated ones for Kievs and Contaxes. The reason ? several ones but the most important refers to a "new" factor, never taken into consideration by me. There is a certain amount of friction at the lips of the feeding cassete, that Kievs and Contaxes are built to accept.
We can assume that any commercial cassete is built below that ammount, for free feeding action, and there is nothing to worry about here. But this is not necessarily the situation with home loaded cassetes from bulk film. The great advantage of using the two cylindred original contax/kiev cassetes is in their opening upon camera closing, fully freeing the sprockets, and the whole shutter mechanism, from unnecessary load. Interesting, not?
Now, comming back to Maizenberg's book in general, we have to take into account this book was written by the early sixties, when the Kievs were relatively young cameras. The Kievs we buy today, are rather different in their condition, making the Kiev Project highly relevant. Furthermore at his time, it seems from the book there were a lot of fixers of these breed available, therefore some hard issues he recommends us to go there instead of doing it ourselves.
Nevertheless, my good fellows, no better investment than having this book. In the long term it will save us a lot of money and time. Again, again and again, ignorance is the mother of all evils.
Cheers,
Ruben
BTW, there is a kind of problem there when reading, in that you may be at page 289 for example, and he refers you again to a pic found at page 356 or 253 - this resulting into a very annoying proceeding.
But with the instruments available today, I have scanned all pics related to Kievs, then enlarged each one to A4 size, printed them and made an auxiliary second book of drawings, allowing me speedy finding, extraordinary size view, and the most important - I can continue reading page 289 and have besides the drawing found at page 356.
(*) Note I phrase myself "he seems to recommend", because interestingly he takes along his book great care in not saying 'this is better', in issues we daily take sides here at RFF.
When analysing the options, Maizenberg usually weights the different positive and negative sides of each thing, leving final judgement upon the reader. Great master.
Last edited by a moderator: