Mario Testino + Pentax 67 @ 1/30 second

With (studio) flash, the shutter speed is fairly irrelevant. By industry standard, studio flash focus lights are calibrated to be equivalent to the flash intensity at 1s exposure time, so even at the (slow) 1/30s sync speed of the Pentax the incandescents were still six EV below the flash exposure - invisible except for a few freak situations.
 
What are we trying to prove here, that Testino is a Robot?

With flash, the shutter speed is irrelevant. Sevo explained it well. So no, Testino is not a Robot.
 
Thanks for posting this. A really fantastic profile on Testino.

Where did you see the 1/30 info? I'm only half through the documentary, and saving the rest for later, but...

• I never got sharp results from the Pentax 67. Not sure why. Others can do 1/30, and i couldn't. Maybe i have Avian Bone Syndrome — hollow bones? Not enough structure and stability? Either way, 1/30 should not be a prescription for 'sharpness.' He shoots a large volume of film, so it's easier to choose the few acceptably sharp shots from a session. And, sometimes he 'engineers' the blur and softness, for a lively/action feel. Like he was doing with Sigourney Weaver, indoors, at the window/door. He was in motion, as was she, and the result was soft and blurred. A lot of his published, famous shots are not critically sharp. But, there's 'feel' and life in that. Sometimes. I'm sure there are thousands of similar shots that were discarded because they didn't work and looked like accidents.

• He doesn't always shoot handheld. Lots of video of him shooting on very heavy tripods. So, we can't look at individual images and assume his style is typically accomplished handheld. Plus, lots with flash, or with high-output HMI... Blazing Rio sun, etc....

But, whatever — great video so far. It presents him and the work in an even better 'light' than i've ever seen before, and i've been a fan since the 80s.

Funny, kind of, how they were basically trashing his early work, but to me it all looked pretty fantastic, polished, and professional. Not the style into which he evolved, but good nevertheless.

Funny, also, to see him flying in a jacket and french cuffs. A beautiful thing, in contrast to how the rest of the world seems to have devolved into shorts and flip-flops. I wish elegance would return, but i know it cannot.
 
Not trying to prove anything here other than the fact that many state it is an impossible camera to get good results handheld @ 1/30sec. Also, I think it is one of the better photographer documentaries that I've seen and thought some might find it enjoyable also. Throughout the documentary, his assistant does hold the flash attached to the body of his P67 which all of us P67 shooters know is 1/30 second maximum. He is using various lens but, none of them are the 90mm or the 165 leaf shutter lenses... I never stated that he only shoots hand held nor did he only use the Pentax at that time in his career, as there is one shoot in this doc where he is using a Mamiya RB or RZ.
 
Well, i for one, misunderstood your initial language. I thought you were suggesting it's not a problem to shoot at 1/30 without a flash.

With a flash is typically not a problem unless ambient light creates ghosting, but even 1/30 is fast enough to not get any appreciable ghosting. That Lumidyne(?) flash held on his lens axis is going to freeze action/motion well enough that the low sync speed is irrelevant.

The two different periods that i owned Pentax 67s (version II), i only shot in-studio, with Profoto strobes, and never concerned myself with the sync speed. That really isn't that much of an issue. I thought you were speaking about the notorious mirror impact of this camera — that's why i didn't get sharp results, when shooting in daylight.

But, whatever. Good video. Thanks, again, for posting it.
 
Excuse the cast from the lomo film but 1/30th is perfectly handholdable. I use the MLU-Release method.

12260115333_227f62692b_c.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom