Probably cured by its own weight? 😀
That Zeiss 100mm 2.8 really seems interesting if just only for the aperture it advertises.
As with the f2's in 645, 6x6 & 6x7, it would be quite interesting if other more mainstream cameras had one of these. For the format I'd like to imagine it with the Texas Leicas. For one, a quick google shows the zeiss has a 58mm filter, not that big.
If only for bokehcalipse, including focusing and Dof impracticalities. GG focusing of the Linhofs and this lens might be mighty for portraits... thinking about things that in reality I never shoot.
The other day a friend dragged me into an argument. He craves a 14mm (which in APS is UW I guess) and for damn everything he's telling me it'd be the lens. Not good trying to argue him to use wis very nice 24-70 and 70-200 instead! Had me thinking about the Biogon on 6x9.
You do find some damn fine bargains out there. Hope the recementing goes well, if not... you might get a great lomoish lens. Well sorted CRA.
***
BTW, as the topic of film prices and hoarding went on about the thread, have you gotten notice about the phasing out of Acros sheets (4x5, 8x10)? Was on APUG from phoblographer last week. 35mm and 120 unaffected supposedly. Might be the time to grab a few boxes of 4x5 for long exposures.
Superia 200 is also supposed to be axed, a mighty fine consumer material. One can only guess what weird thing Fuji are thinking about.