redsky
Established
I am the owner of a R2A, and last week got a - never used - R3M 250 Jahre. One of the things I noticed right away was the difference between the meters in the two cameras. More precisely, there are two main differences:
1- R3M meter is center-weight, while R2A will meter closer to the left bottom of the frame. That's ok, I just need to get used to it.
2- R3M meter seems to have a stop-metering mechanism that is triggered when I try to meter under certain ISO/Speed combinations. If I set my ISO 3200 and shutter speed 1/8s, for example, the meter blinks -2 and will not change, regardless amount of available light or aperture. R2A meter will work very well under the dimmest light, while R3M will be blocked for (3200/8, 1600/4, 800/2, 400/1) ISO/speed combinations. I confess I do not like that since I see myself shooting 3200/8 often. I can work around the issue by using 3200/15, metering +1, and then decreasing the shutter speed to 1/8s and shooting, but I find it to be an inconvenience. So, I just want to make sure this is the standard behavior for any R?M. Has anybody else noticed this?
Thanks
1- R3M meter is center-weight, while R2A will meter closer to the left bottom of the frame. That's ok, I just need to get used to it.
2- R3M meter seems to have a stop-metering mechanism that is triggered when I try to meter under certain ISO/Speed combinations. If I set my ISO 3200 and shutter speed 1/8s, for example, the meter blinks -2 and will not change, regardless amount of available light or aperture. R2A meter will work very well under the dimmest light, while R3M will be blocked for (3200/8, 1600/4, 800/2, 400/1) ISO/speed combinations. I confess I do not like that since I see myself shooting 3200/8 often. I can work around the issue by using 3200/15, metering +1, and then decreasing the shutter speed to 1/8s and shooting, but I find it to be an inconvenience. So, I just want to make sure this is the standard behavior for any R?M. Has anybody else noticed this?
Thanks