Lobo
Minimalist
Hi Ragefinders,
i have 2 Minolta AL-F Rangefinder cameras here, bought recently. Very fine cameras, with good buildquality and fitting ergonomics. They are between the tiny 1970s RF like the Konica C35 and its clones and the more massive mid 1960s RF like Yashica Lynx or Electro 35.
But there is one strange thing:
camera No1 seem to be an early one with a Serialnr of 118XXX, still Japan Quality control sticker from 1974. Its Viewfinder is blue tinted. No2 has a Serialnr of 917XXX and its viewfinder is magenta tinted. Both have slightly different Lensring on the front, i will make a pic tomorrow.
I wonder why No1 meters more towards closing the aperture, e.g f=11, while no2 prefers f=8 for the same situation. I took reference with a digital camera and a Gossen lightmeter, where they tend more to f=8.
Also the No1s Meter tend to fluctuate or react more when moving the view slightly, while No2s meter seem to be more stable.
Which one is more accurate?
I know about the Contract Light Compensation System (CLC), where the lower half meter is doubled in sensivity to compensate the bright sky.


i have 2 Minolta AL-F Rangefinder cameras here, bought recently. Very fine cameras, with good buildquality and fitting ergonomics. They are between the tiny 1970s RF like the Konica C35 and its clones and the more massive mid 1960s RF like Yashica Lynx or Electro 35.
But there is one strange thing:
camera No1 seem to be an early one with a Serialnr of 118XXX, still Japan Quality control sticker from 1974. Its Viewfinder is blue tinted. No2 has a Serialnr of 917XXX and its viewfinder is magenta tinted. Both have slightly different Lensring on the front, i will make a pic tomorrow.
I wonder why No1 meters more towards closing the aperture, e.g f=11, while no2 prefers f=8 for the same situation. I took reference with a digital camera and a Gossen lightmeter, where they tend more to f=8.
Also the No1s Meter tend to fluctuate or react more when moving the view slightly, while No2s meter seem to be more stable.
Which one is more accurate?
I know about the Contract Light Compensation System (CLC), where the lower half meter is doubled in sensivity to compensate the bright sky.

