alan davus
Well-known
Yes Keith, Redbacks are a mighty fine pair of work boots (I prefer Rossi's myself) but for stepping out it's got to be R.M. Williams, $350 for sure but they'll last a lifetime.
right on Keith. after years of Blundstones, I'm now a Redback booter. Got my last few pairs at Rays Camping in Melbourne, a fine place for those with camping GAS.
Dear Keith,
And?
First, a lot depends on what fits. I had a marvellous pair of shoes I bought in a German cheapo-market for 12€ or so. I bought them as a laugh: they were red suède. I wore them until they fell to pieces, and they were sublimely comfortable. Most shoes I buy aren't, so it's cheaper to buy one pair of well-fitting, long-lasting boots than lots of cheaper pairs.
Second, this still doesn't address the question of luxuries. What have you against luxury goods? For that matter, how do you define luxury goods? And why shouldn't a camera manufacturer make a luxury camera?
Cheers,
R.
A fraction of the price of a Ferrari, and half the price of even a modest boat. Why do so many people have so much of a problem with Leicas? Because they're smaller than Ferraris or boats? Offer me a Ferrari, a boat and a Leica, to use not to sell, and it's a dead easy choice for me.
Cheers,
R.
Good point Roger. Yachts and Ferraris are also unnecessarily ostentatious.
I don't think the problem is with Leica. It's with certain products Leica offers. In fact, it's not a 'problem' at all. It's just that some people, many of them Leica users, think it's kind of funny to spend $18,000 on a camera and a lens.
I'm sure there are many fishermen that bristle when a yacht steers through their waters...
But, Roger, I don't think it can be reduced to sour grapes. Even if I could afford an M9 + Noctilux, I wouldn't buy it at this price. The thought makes me a bit sick. There are many people who can afford luxury items who do not buy luxury items. And not because they're cheap people.
(That's a solid joke. And my grandparents were all Russians.)
$18,000 is a lot... but will it make me a better photographer??? 🙂
We're at the universal discrepancy between those who may be the best users of an object not necessarily being the ones who can afford it.
There are plenty of great drivers driving modest cars when they have the ability to use a Ferrari for what it is capable of but can't because they happen to be, say, teachers or nurses rather than merchant bankers or property tycoons.
Likewise many very able photographers who use this site and produce magnificent work do truly understand what a combination of M9 + Noctilux is capable of yet will never have an opportunity to use them. When it is perceived that some of the people who may purchase these objects buy them as a trophy object then that does frustrate.
It's a human condition to both desire the best and to be unable to reach it.
However, I do think cameras are relatively inexpensive, even Leicas. My main pasttime is sailing and I know people who will happily spend a lot on a set of racing sails only to throw them away after a couple of years use. The cost of mooring even a modest boat on the south coast of the UK, say a 36fter, is many thousands of pounds a year - so a one-off cost to buy a top-quality item with no running costs to speak of, plus a substantial retained value on the second-hand market, makes cameras relatively small beer, providing of course one has the spare cash up front to purchase them. I know all too well many of us do not.
I'd have the new Noct 0.95 in a heartbeat if I was rolling in money. Why not?