Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
Got my first roll of slides back, shot with my 'new' M2. Most of them were severly underexposed. Used a Gossen Digiflash handheld meter in reflective mode. Battery was fresh.
I also had my Nikon FE with me, this generally gave readings about a stop lower than the Gossen. I elaborated this further and found out that the Gossen readings differ quite a bit from the Nikon in almost all cases. I realize that the metering pattern is different, but this much difference? It almost looks like the Gossen does not give an average reading, but a highlight reading.
But even when pointing it at the ground the readings are too high.
I shots slides with FM and FE's regularly, and they were all well exposed. To be honest, the slides from the M2 look so dark that it it is probaly more difference than one stop, so the shutter of the M2 is probably off too.
So, what's up? Is it me being silly, or is my meter not good? Is it too much to expect that a handheld meter would give me half decent slides?
I also had my Nikon FE with me, this generally gave readings about a stop lower than the Gossen. I elaborated this further and found out that the Gossen readings differ quite a bit from the Nikon in almost all cases. I realize that the metering pattern is different, but this much difference? It almost looks like the Gossen does not give an average reading, but a highlight reading.
But even when pointing it at the ground the readings are too high.
I shots slides with FM and FE's regularly, and they were all well exposed. To be honest, the slides from the M2 look so dark that it it is probaly more difference than one stop, so the shutter of the M2 is probably off too.
So, what's up? Is it me being silly, or is my meter not good? Is it too much to expect that a handheld meter would give me half decent slides?