More War against Photography

dogbunny

Registered Boozer
Local time
11:30 AM
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
560
Location
熊本市, Japan
I know it is on the lomo website, but some of ya'll might be interested in
This link. I skimmed through it, some of it was interesting. Sorry if it has been posted before, but it is just a few days old.

Cheers,

DB
 
I would think that out of 100 Senators and 430-something Representatives, we would have at least one amateur photographer, perhaps even a {gasp!} film or RF fan, who would realize this and be willing to introduce some sanity-based legislation to deal with this.
 
I would think that out of 100 Senators and 430-something Representatives, we would have at least one amateur photographer, perhaps even a {gasp!} film or RF fan, who would realize this and be willing to introduce some sanity-based legislation to deal with this.

You know you can be banned for using the words Senators, Representatives, Legislation and SANITY in the same post?

I will let it go this time, but just saying...
 
From what I know, it is not illegal in any country to take pictures of anyone or anything, as long as it is in public.

The only provisions that exist (and might be different among countries) regulate the usage of the photo after it's been taken.
 
You know you can be banned for using the words Senators, Representatives, Legislation and SANITY in the same post?

I will let it go this time, but just saying...

Can I use; self-serving, deceitful, duplicitous and arse-with-both-hands in the same post ... without getting into trouble that is?
 
From what I know, it is not illegal in any country to take pictures of anyone or anything, as long as it is in public.

The only provisions that exist (and might be different among countries) regulate the usage of the photo after it's been taken.

Try taking some photos of jets on a fighter base In Greece and see how far that gets you....
 
From what I know, it is not illegal in any country to take pictures of anyone or anything, as long as it is in public.

The only provisions that exist (and might be different among countries) regulate the usage of the photo after it's been taken.

I take it you meant that you don't know which countries have codified prohibitions on public photography, right?
 
N. African/Middle Eastern countries (Tunisia, Sudan) come to mind, I'm sure there are more.

Even longer, of course, is this list of places where photography will land in you in hot water, U.S. included, regardless of the law.
 
People don't realize how much privacy they gave up without a cry. The public gets all worked up about a streetphotographer but don't care they are followed from there frontdoor and back.

Have a cellphone; youre trackable
Used youre creditcard/bankcard; it's known what and were you buy
Got a electronic buscard; registers were en when you travelled.
Electronic trafficspeed systems photographes youre registrationplate.
Got a DSL/cable internet; that bootleg DVD you downloaded, your ISP knows.

And I could go one for a long time. But a guy/gal taking pictures in the street.....It must be a terrorist
(and by typing terrorist in this reply it is monitored by CIA/MI5/BVD 😀😀)


The best thing to do about your privacy is not to worry about it, because you have no privacy what so ever😎
 
the best defense against being hassled by the cops in America (for anything, but this is true of photography in a big way too) is to have white skin.

Also here in Boston the MBTA people and government building security dont seem like they particularly care about taking photos as long as you dont give off the appearance of being a trouble maker (see previous statement). I think on the MBTA website they even acknowledge that people have non nefarious reasons for taking pictures of trains.

In Memphis, well no one seems to care much about anything in general. I took a few pictures of cops arresting people and they honestly didnt care.
 
Back
Top Bottom