Leica LTM Most compact ready-to-shoot LTM rig?

Leica M39 screw mount bodies/lenses

pagpow

Well-known
Local time
2:11 PM
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Messages
991
I seem to be on a size kick as I sort out cameras/lenses to make them more accessible, decide which to sell, update want list, etc.

Ignoring collapsibles, which need to be erected, is there anything that would beat a 3c/3f plus summaron, plus VC 28/35 finder, for compactness? convenience? silence?
 
A III or IIIa is 1/8" shorter in length than the IIIc/IIIf you mention, but your choice probably provides a more reliable shutter system due to the improved body construction.

Personally, I have used a IIIf/Jupiter 12/CV35 finder combination, which, though slightly larger, works great.

Jim N.
 
Try the Orion and you have a real vest pocket (here on my sold M4-2 with the best viewfinder you can find)

Leica%20M4-2.JPG
 
I seem to be on a size kick as I sort out cameras/lenses to make them more accessible, decide which to sell, update want list, etc.

Ignoring collapsibles, which need to be erected, is there anything that would beat a 3c/3f plus summaron, plus VC 28/35 finder, for compactness? convenience? silence?

I was going to answer your question: No.

But then I saw Roland's reply...:)

Roland is right, as usual. :):)

One might add: a Leica CL w/ an LTM adapter for your summaron...
 
if you do eventually go for a 50mm collapsible of some sort, the SBOOI finder on a IIIf/IIIc is surprisingly pocket friendly; round design doesn't catch on clothing, etc.

IIIf/SBOOI/Elmar 50/3.5 is my pocket camera of choice.
 
if you do eventually go for a 50mm collapsible of some sort, the SBOOI finder on a IIIf/IIIc is surprisingly pocket friendly; round design doesn't catch on clothing, etc.

IIIf/SBOOI/Elmar 50/3.5 is my pocket camera of choice.

I have used that combo, and also use the IIIf/SBOOI/Summitar 50/2.0, which is what is currently on my IIIf RD. A little larger, but more useful in low light situations.

Jim N.
 
The 35/3.5 Elmar and 28/6.3 Hektor are a bit smaller than a older (A36) 35/3.5 Summaron. But the Summaron is a better lens than either of those, and a lot cheaper than them to boot. The difference is quite small in size. You also get a real aperture ring on the Summaron, not the little tab.

Now, the E39 35/3.5 Summaron is larger, of course.

The Canon RF 35/2.8 and 28/3.5 (early heavy chrome) are also very compact. The first is excellent, if low contrast; the second is reasonable for the period, and better than the Summaron 28/5.6.
 
I have this rig (3f+summaron), except with the Leitz finder, and I adore it. I carry it with me every day. Alas, my 3F needs a new curtain, so I will be forlorn for a while.
 
This combo fits in my cargo pants pocket (for summer) or jacket pocket (in winter).

2693039383_167ae4d737.jpg


Zorki 1 with Jupiter-12 and FSU 35mm finder :)
 
A hand held light meter adds to your carry around package. I've always liked the Konica C-35 or one of it's Minolta/Olympus variants. It's a small. light camera w/ good metering, exposure lock, and a sharp little lens. Shutter is extremely quiet.
 
The variety seen in this thread indicates that absolute size has little to do with individual preference.
 
My go-everywhere rig is my III c/w CV35mm f2.5 & Helios VF, although I tend to carry it around in an old jessops bag with the VF in it's own little pouch, so has to be assembled before use.
 
Picked up this nice kit at Fedka, and I know I'm not in the FSU forum, but this certainly pertains... (This is a Fed 2, in case you're not familiar with the FSU cameras or Cryllic)
453133399_a8e29d4ea8.jpg
 
Picked up this nice kit at Fedka, and I know I'm not in the FSU forum, but this certainly pertains... (This is a Fed 2, in case you're not familiar with the FSU cameras or Cryllic)
453133399_a8e29d4ea8.jpg

Thats a real beauty albeit not completely vintage. Did you shoot with it, if yes, how is your experience?
 
Back
Top Bottom