sherm said:
For someone who is interested in different film, can you please explain to me the attributes of Kodachrome.
I'm having what I call a final fling with Kodachrome (64) before it goes bibi4ever, which is more or less certain in the next several years some time.
Kodachrome has often been the "gold standard" against which other films were judged.
Sharpness, fine grain, great detail, and natural color rendition are what I like about it. It's not highly saturated, some call it "muted" or "subdued" compared to today's films. You definitely don't get that "Fuji blue" sky with Kodachrome. "Accurate" is the word I would use to describe Kodachrome's color.
It does have its down sides too. As far as exposure is concerned, it can't take a joke. You have to be right on, very little tolerance, as is the case with most other slide films as well.
Dynamic range is lacking (as with most other slide films as well) when compared to today's negative films. I wouldn't even consider using Kodachrome for any high-contrast scenes.
Ditto with color temperature. It's picky about what you try to feed it. It's daylight balanced, and it seems to actually amplify or exaggerate any coloration from non-daylight sources which happen to be in your scene. I'm really spoiled by the way Fuji negative films tolerate mixed light sources.
As has been mentioned, processing is less convenient than other films. Dwayne's does a good job, however, and I always get same-week turn-around by mail. Thanks to reports here, I'm going to try one of their CD scan disks when I am done with the current roll in the Mamiya.