kshapero
South Florida Man
I suppose a 35 but right now I have an CV 40mm f1.4 sc and I almost never take it off the body. That single coating provides a little more contrast in sunny Florida.
markinlondon
Elmar user
A 50 does nearly everything for me. I'll use a 35 for a bit more width when travelling, my 35 is also lighter than either of my 50's.
Anything wider than 35 = boring wide open spaces in my hands so I tend to avoid them.
Anything wider than 35 = boring wide open spaces in my hands so I tend to avoid them.
mervynyan
Mervyn Yan
i found myself using 75mm more often than the 35mm, mainly because I can get a tight frame, while the context is important, personally I think cropped subject leaves open imaginations.
R
rich815
Guest
35mm is probably the most versatile but I favor 50mm myself for probably 80% of my work.
Roma
Well-known
When I use 50, I love 50, when I use 35, I love 35. I used to use 28 and I loved 28. If I had to pick 1, I would pick 35, but I would hate to make that choice.
Stephanie Brim
Mental Experimental.
50. But that's because it's what I started out with and I'm most comfortable with it.
jarski
Veteran
some who voted 35mm (like me) would have gone 50mm back then when nobody knew what crop factor is..
thomasw_
Well-known
No question 50.28.35.135 in order of preference currently. But this has a lot to with Roland's suggestion that I obtain the ZM 28/2.8. I love my ZM 28 almost as much as my 50/1.4; but the nod does go to my 50/1.4 for versatility. I should add that soon I hope to try out the CV 40/1.4, which should be a sweet FL to use for me, being a 50 FL fan who likes the 35 FL but only has a CV 35/1.2 currently. I love my CV 35/1.2 but it is not as portable as the 40/1.4 looks to be.
35mmdelux
Veni, vidi, vici
FrankS said:50mm for me. If I back up far enough I can usually get most of what I want, and its long enough to use for a portrait lens if you're careful. It's also long enough to isolate details and be rid of distracting background elements that distract from the main idea/subject of the photo. Sometimes a 35 is perfect, but usually it's a 50 for me.
good point. I shot with 50mm lens for 20 years until I discovered the Leica M and its 35mm Summicron III in 1991.
The last year I've re-discovered the 50 and now have 50mm Lux pre-asph and 50 Elmar M. They are simply fabulous but I still use the 35 alot.
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
My most-used rangefinder lenses are 21mm through 90mm. It's interesting that when I take the geometric average of 21mm and 90mm, I get 37.5mm. That's halfway in-between 35mm and 40mm; arguably making either of those a valid choice as the best general walkaround lens. I have long felt that 35mm is the best single focal length (I don't own a 40 to compare it with). Others have said 40mm is best. So I thought it interesting that the geometric center point fell halfway in between those choices.
goo0h
Well-known
Even though I have always preferred the perspective of the 50mm, in terms of "most versatile focal length", objectively I'd probably say 35mm and that's what I voted for.....
sam_m
Well-known
Without a shadow of a doubt, 40mm is the Goldielocks of focal lengths.
Iggy
Member
Jack of all
Jack of all
Master of none(?) but 50 is the one for me.
I've been using a 55mm f1.6 Fujinon (hazy at 1.6, divine at f2) on a an old Fujica screw mount slr and that just feels natural. T'is how the world looks but maybe I'm a tad miopic.
Been without an rf for 18 months but I'm about to rectify that, likely as not with a ZI and a 50.
Jack of all
Master of none(?) but 50 is the one for me.
I've been using a 55mm f1.6 Fujinon (hazy at 1.6, divine at f2) on a an old Fujica screw mount slr and that just feels natural. T'is how the world looks but maybe I'm a tad miopic.
Been without an rf for 18 months but I'm about to rectify that, likely as not with a ZI and a 50.
alcaraban
Established
I currently have 28, 35, 50 and a 40 fixed-lens rangefinder. In terms of "more versatile", 28 is certainly too wide for me as a general purpose lens and 50 is often too long, while 35mm frames quite the same as my own eyes. But my best shots are taken with the 50.
Said that, obviously there are great shooters around which mainly use a 28, or a 50, etc...
Said that, obviously there are great shooters around which mainly use a 28, or a 50, etc...
jjovin
Established
35 by a long shot!
retow
Well-known
Would be interesting to analyse correlations between preferred focal lenghts and subjects/styles the respective groups focus on.
Or is it as simmple as 35 for city boys and girls and 50 for country girls and boys?
Or is it as simmple as 35 for city boys and girls and 50 for country girls and boys?
V
varjag
Guest
It is easier for me to shoot with 35, but I somehow prefer 50. Wonder if my most versatile could really be a 40 
topoxforddoc
Established
I like my 35 lux a lot for striaght forward shooting. My other favourite lens is my 75 lux, but it's the 35 that goes out most.
Charlie
Charlie
dazedgonebye
Veteran
I voted 40mm, but could have gone with 35mm
mike goldberg
The Peaceful Pacific
35 is the most versatile, yet in RFF with FSU cameras, I have 'rediscovered' the 50.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.