MP vs. M2/M3 handling

[Rafael]

I am interested in the experiences of those who have used both an MP and an M2 or M3. Apart from the different framelines, the different VF magnification (in the case of the M3), and the meter that is in the MP, in what ways does an MP differ from a properly CLA'd M3 or M2?

I realise that answers to this question will likely be very subjective. Obviously, the best option would be to handle the different cameras myself. However, since no store in town here has any of the three in stock, I appeal to the collected experiences of RFF members instead.

 

[Rafael]

I just found THIS thread (missed it when I first searched the archives). Sorry for repeating the question. Still, if anyone has anything else to add...

 

[steve garza]

I've no experience (other than camera show fondling,) w/ the M3. But do own a nicely working M2 and a recently purchased MP a la carte. The MP is the nicer of the two cameras for the following reasons:

It's lighter--a joy to carry that camera w a 50mm collapsible lens on a strap and no damn bag!

The shutter is quiter--there is no doubt. I've read here that the shutter mechanism was re-designed.

The shutter release is smooth but you can anticipate the actual realease.

The VF is brighter and focus patch more contrasty than in the M2. Wonderful to look through.

The film wind is smoother.

A note: the ISO dial on the rear is very easy to turn and clicks nicely into place unlike the M6TTL which was always a bitch to use. Now I actually leave the batteries in the camera so I can use the meter.

My M2 is a heavy duty camera and works flawlessly. The single framelines and lack of meter indicators make for easier framing and composition. Also, the weight adds a sense of stability. My model happens to come with a self timer which is nice to have.