peter_n said:
Oscar I saw
the Neopan 400/Diafine shots you posted over on PN. I'm curious about your own sense of the contrast this combination provides. I'm impressed with the fine grain, but I do wonder about the "punch" that I definitely get with Neopan 400 and XTOL development.
Peter, I only tried Neopan 400 in Diafine... in fact Diafine is the only developer I use, so I try to stick with films which I like souped on it. I know that I could try some other developers and sure some of them could give outstanding combinations of film/dev, but with the summer already here I'd had a hard time trying to control chemical temperature, and I'm just plain lazy
🙂
So, currently it's the developer that dictates my film choice. Before that, when the lab processed my rolls, I used HP5+ and liked the results much better than when I processed it in Diafine.
But as Tom proves, you can use that combo for some outstanding shots, as always it's just a matter of personal choices.
As for those images, the ones from the park were quite hard to scan and adjust properly as they were quite overexposed. For more Neopan/Diafine examples, well, almost all my shots on the gallery come from that combination
🙂
Do you have some Neopan400/XTOL examples ?