Canon LTM My Canon 7 is engraved "CAMEPA" on the back

Canon M39 M39 screw mount bodies/lenses

granitsky

Newbie
Local time
11:58 AM
Joined
Oct 6, 2016
Messages
5
Just wondering if this misspelling was common or not. It's in the engraving and not just paint missing either. I can put up a picture if anyone's interested.
 
Just wondering if this misspelling was common or not. It's in the engraving and not just paint missing either. I can put up a picture if anyone's interested.

P in Cyrillic is pronounced R, must be Russian made engraving... Camera in Russian is "камера", so it probably explains...
 
Not common - indeed their quality control seems to have had an eye on engravings, more so than Leica and Zeiss, which both produced a sizeable output of mis-engraved cameras IN THEIR OWN NATIVE LANGUAGE AND ALPHABET. Most Japanese engravers in the 1960s probably could not spell the Latin alphabet at all, nonetheless there are few mis-engraved cameras and lenses from the more prestigious Japanese brands...
 
This looks machine-made
spd_20150723142810_b.jpg
 
They did not have CNC or laser engraving back then. These were done just like jewelry engraving. There is a pantograph by which the human user traces big letters on a pattern (like a stencil). The pantograph translates that motion through an engraving point into a much smaller space on the camera. I've seen this in Leica videos, so it's still going on. But if you miss part of the R in that process, you obviously get P. So not misspelled so much as incomplete.

Dante
 
That Canon 7 is worth a small fortune !

It belonged to legendary war photographer Robert Camepa.
 
here's a photo

here's a photo

As you can see in the photo, it's definitely engraved that way and there was never any paint to rub off.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4526.jpg
    IMG_4526.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 0
This is odd because its a late serial number too, I could imagine a mistake like this on an earlier camera but on a late one?
 
This is odd because its a late serial number too, I could imagine a mistake like this on an earlier camera but on a late one?

Disregard what I said there, wrong image i responded to.

This is actually a fairly low SN so actually it backs up the theory it could be a mistake in manufacturing that could have maybe been fixed later on
 
Disregard what I said there, wrong image i responded to.

This is actually a fairly low SN so actually it backs up the theory it could be a mistake in manufacturing that could have maybe been fixed later on

Is there a serial no database? What year is this camera from? I know the range but I would like to figure out all the info I can.
 
Back
Top Bottom