Rob-F
Likes Leicas
JSU: I enjoyed your comments (while sipping a little Glenlivet single malt).
Best,
Rob
Best,
Rob
I know nothing about the Leica M8 and have been reading this thread for enlightenment but I am confused. Aside from ergonometric criticisms Kamber convincingly stated that there was (1) a green color cast; (2) noise at higher iso's (3) too much depth of field at wide angle and (4) erratic metering and color balance.QUOTE]
(1) No, even with early cameras
(2) Yes, Depends on what you can accept.
(3) No: completely meaningless, if you think about it
(4) No more problems with the current software than with any other camera. Early WB awful.
(M8 user since December 2006, M8.2 user since they came out).
Cheers,
R.
My reference to the M8.2 as a whole different camera was a comparison to the M8 circa 2007 with which Kamber had stong issues. That was what you seemingly referenced with the inclusion of the link to his report. He had repeated failures, the camera at inopportune moments simply quit, green banding in the files and then of course the IR cut issues. And don't forget that the earliest M8's were all recalled to have an internal board replaced.
One very big difference between the first issue of the M8 and the current M8.2 is the firmware, no doubt the same camera will respond very differently depending on which generation of firmware. I have no way of knowing but I doubt based on the timeline of his report that he had any of the 2.xxx firmware in his M8's.
I have not heard nor read of these particular issues in the M8.2. My own pair of M8.2's have been flawless in the few months I have used them. I have not had the opportunity to use them in a war zone or in a desert environment. Since I began working with electronically controlled cameras I have been particularly careful with them in the rain. As such I would treat the M8.2 no differently than I would a Nikon FE or N-90S.