furcafe
Veteran
What's the deal w/"RPP"? Do you have any info on the application? I prefer using Capture One because that's what I use w/my M8, but it also doesn't play w/the LX3 raw files.
Thanks, Chris
Thanks, Chris
. . . since Lightroom cannot handle the Panasonic I had to download RPP for the Mac in order to convert both files with the same program/parameters.
I'll hopefully get around to that tomorrow night.
Cheers,
Dave
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I was pretty bent out of shape at first because of the lack of Lightroom support, but once I pixel-peeped the jpegs I stopped caring. They really are excellent, especially in B&W, and I see nothing wrong with Panasonic correcting barrel distortion, fringing, and CA in software.
I do think Adobe will eventually add LX3 RAW support that includes comparable correction.
I do think Adobe will eventually add LX3 RAW support that includes comparable correction.
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
What's the deal w/"RPP"? Do you have any info on the application? I prefer using Capture One because that's what I use w/my M8, but it also doesn't play w/the LX3 raw files.
Thanks, Chris
Hey Chris,
RPP is "Raw Photo Processor" but it's for the Mac only:
http://www.raw-photo-processor.com/RPP/Overview.html
I haven't used it yet but have installed it on the Mac Pro at home and from what I've seen of it so far, it looks pretty intuitive and easy to use - I didn't like what I saw in SilkyPix - just seemed, to me at least, like a lot of guessing about which button does what and so forth.
I found the link via reading up the comments on the "Serious Compacts" blog:
http://www.seriouscompacts.com/2008/10/is-panasonic-hindering-third-party-lx3.html
Cheers,
Dave
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Ok.. here's a bit of an update.
The "haloing" that's occurring in the Panasonic images by the pot lights is, to the best of my knowledge, something funky in the RPP software. The shots were all taken wide open with both lenses - the Panasonic lens is, clearly, sharp wide open but that barrel distortion is present and can be easily seen. The Ricoh, I think, is good but I don't think it's as sharp as the Panasonic - not that it's horrible, but the LX3 has an edge imho.
Hope this helps a bit more ..
Cheers,
Dave
- Distortion on the LX3
Yep, it exists.
Here's a shot out of the camera JPEG
and here's one that was RAW converted in Raw Photo Processor (RPP)
That's at the wide end - I haven't bothered to do any at the telephoto end as of yet.
- RAW images @ ISO 800
A comparison b/w RAW shots from the GR Digital II at ISO 800 and the LX3 at ISO 800 - both converted in RAW Photo Processor with the same parameters. The crops and second LX3 shot was adjusted for exposure, "warmth, and white balance.
LX3 via RPP @ ISO800 no adjustments:
GR Digital II via RPP @ ISO800 no adjustments:
LX3 (on the left/above) and GR Digital II (on the right/below) 100% top left crops:
LX3 (on the left/above) and GR Digital II (on the right/below) 100% center crops:
Finally, the LX3 shot adjusted via RPP:
The "haloing" that's occurring in the Panasonic images by the pot lights is, to the best of my knowledge, something funky in the RPP software. The shots were all taken wide open with both lenses - the Panasonic lens is, clearly, sharp wide open but that barrel distortion is present and can be easily seen. The Ricoh, I think, is good but I don't think it's as sharp as the Panasonic - not that it's horrible, but the LX3 has an edge imho.
Hope this helps a bit more ..
Cheers,
Dave
Share: