Congrats!
Is the 28mm Zeiss lens known to be sharper than say the Biogon 35/2 or 35/2.8?
Raid - OP has the 25mm, which is one of, if not the sharpest ZM lenses. OTOH, anecdotally, the 28 ZM is not quite as sharp as the 25 or either ZM 35 (I used to own the 35/2.0 and now the 35/2.8), or the 50 Planar for that matter.
Raid - OP has the 25mm, which is one of, if not the sharpest ZM lenses. OTOH, anecdotally, the 28 ZM is not quite as sharp as the 25 or either ZM 35 (I used to own the 35/2.0 and now the 35/2.8), or the 50 Planar for that matter.
A fact that has doubters, who use same chemicals and film..Yes, the 2.8/25 is quite legendary. When Zeiss were first building them they took one from the production line - no special selection - and recorded 400 lp/mm on Spur Orthopan microfilm at f4. I think that's effectively diffraction limited.
Mike
A fact that has doubters, who use same chemicals and film..
I think Zeiss over stated the case.
When is a statement not a simple publicity brag but outright lie?
Who has ever seen such a high number of resolution..on actual film?
Not aerial image BUT on film.
A fact that has doubters, who use same chemicals and film..
I think Zeiss over stated the case.
When is a statement not a simple publicity brag but outright lie?
Who has ever seen such a high number of resolution..on actual film?
Not aerial image BUT on film.