shanenoir
Established
Looking good, but I'm not too sure if the focusing is accurate. Stopped down it's sharp in the first photo of the car, but I was pretty sure some of the other shots would be more in focus. I cleaned these up in lightroom.
Olympus 35RC by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Olympus 35RC by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Olympus 35RC by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Olympus 35RC by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Olympus 35RC by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Olympus 35RC by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
10bears
Newbie
Shane,
I have one also. Great little cameras aren't they.
I have one also. Great little cameras aren't they.
*chris
Established
its a sharp little lens and surprised me too. nice shots ...
probably my favorite picture i have yet to take
thought this one would've been a good shot except of my focusing capabilities
this is focused to infinity and not sure how i feel about it
probably my favorite picture i have yet to take
thought this one would've been a good shot except of my focusing capabilities
this is focused to infinity and not sure how i feel about it
Tiger 68
Bram Vermeulen
The car shot is very sharp, the others not quite so. The others appear to be interiors, and maybe a slower shutter speed produced some blur.
The RC is a great camera, and you're off to a good start with it.
Regards,
BV
The RC is a great camera, and you're off to a good start with it.
Regards,
BV
farlymac
PF McFarland
Congrats, Shane, they are great little cameras. I now have two (the second one was a gift). They feel like they're were milled out of a solid block.
In The Open by br1078phot, on Flickr
PF
In The Open by br1078phot, on Flickr
PF
*chris
Established
Congrats, Shane, they are great little cameras. I now have two (the second one was a gift). They feel like they're were milled out of a solid block.
In The Open by br1078phot, on Flickr
PF
i was going to ask what you use to develop/shoot with but i think i read on your flickr somehwere you use bw400cn?
bobby_novatron
Photon Collector
Congrats on your Olympus 35RC! I own two of them, I think they're great little cameras. Fantastic lens on them -- and a nicely compact but usable design.
Here's a shot I took a while back. This was with Kodak 400UC film and an 81A warming filter.
Here's a shot I took a while back. This was with Kodak 400UC film and an 81A warming filter.
farlymac
PF McFarland
This particular roll was with BW400CN, but it's not the only B&W film I use. I now get all my developing and scanning work done at Photo USA in Roanoke, VA.
PF
shanenoir
Established
Some new shots:
Velvia 50:
url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/shane-noir/8560613648/]
[/url]
IMG--2 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
3 Hour long exposure (with remote shutter release)
IMG--4 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
A friend... I forget which film. Negative, not slide.
IMG-2013002 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Sometimes the film advance doesn't work and I accidentally get multiple-exposures.
Sometimes it works
IMG-2013001 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Sometimes it doesnt. Or maybe it kinda does.
IMG-2013011 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Everything so far has been metered with my Sekonic. I really wish I could use the camera's meter, but considering I bought this for its manual controls, I can't complain. Actually, I am really happy with the results.
IMG--14 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Velvia 50:
url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/shane-noir/8560613648/]
IMG--2 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
3 Hour long exposure (with remote shutter release)
IMG--4 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
A friend... I forget which film. Negative, not slide.
IMG-2013002 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Sometimes the film advance doesn't work and I accidentally get multiple-exposures.
Sometimes it works
IMG-2013001 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Sometimes it doesnt. Or maybe it kinda does.
IMG-2013011 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr
Everything so far has been metered with my Sekonic. I really wish I could use the camera's meter, but considering I bought this for its manual controls, I can't complain. Actually, I am really happy with the results.
IMG--14 by -SHANE NOIR-, on Flickr