ChrisN
Striving
Need some guidance and advice here: On Thursday night I had a great evening at a local blues venue, where a friend's band was performing. I had fun exposing a roll of HP5 with available light, of which there was a good amount on the well-lit stage.
I used three lenses, a 35, 50 and a 90. All shot were taken at f2 or 2.8, and 1/125 or 1/60. I have not done much shooting wide-open before, so this was the first time I've needed to focus critically.
Unfortunately, all my shots seem to come out close-focused (ie a point in front of the spot I focused on is sharp).
In the attached shots (all taken with the 90) you'll see that the sharp focus point seems to be anything up to a foot in front of the face of the performer.
I've just set the camera on a tripod and carefully checked the focus at an indicated 4 feet and 6 feet, with several lenses. The three lenses appear to be in agreement about the distance, so I think they are ok (or at least consistent!).
At an indicated 4 feet the camera is 4 feet and 1 inch from the focus target; at 6 feet it's 6 feet and 1.5 inches.
Now I understand that a 90 is more difficult to focus, but the 50 and the 35 showed similar results, albeit less pronounced. Do you think I'm on the right track here - that the rangefinder is out ad needs to be adjusted for distance?
Apologies for the large file sizes - trying to show clear images. What other tests should I perform? Thanks.
I used three lenses, a 35, 50 and a 90. All shot were taken at f2 or 2.8, and 1/125 or 1/60. I have not done much shooting wide-open before, so this was the first time I've needed to focus critically.
Unfortunately, all my shots seem to come out close-focused (ie a point in front of the spot I focused on is sharp).
In the attached shots (all taken with the 90) you'll see that the sharp focus point seems to be anything up to a foot in front of the face of the performer.
I've just set the camera on a tripod and carefully checked the focus at an indicated 4 feet and 6 feet, with several lenses. The three lenses appear to be in agreement about the distance, so I think they are ok (or at least consistent!).
At an indicated 4 feet the camera is 4 feet and 1 inch from the focus target; at 6 feet it's 6 feet and 1.5 inches.
Now I understand that a 90 is more difficult to focus, but the 50 and the 35 showed similar results, albeit less pronounced. Do you think I'm on the right track here - that the rangefinder is out ad needs to be adjusted for distance?
Apologies for the large file sizes - trying to show clear images. What other tests should I perform? Thanks.