sherm
Well-known
Need some ideas on Neopan 1600.
I'd like to use a faster film than Tri-X
Examples would be great, and push/pull info. also appreciated......
Thanks,
Scott
I'd like to use a faster film than Tri-X
Examples would be great, and push/pull info. also appreciated......
Thanks,
Scott
R
ruben
Guest
Neopan processed with Tmax developer (I hope I am not starting WWIII): SUPERB.
My two cents: do whatever you can to stay with neopan1600 as your maximum ISO speed. Beyond that you have to be a big fan of hard grain.
Cheers,
Ruben
My two cents: do whatever you can to stay with neopan1600 as your maximum ISO speed. Beyond that you have to be a big fan of hard grain.
Cheers,
Ruben
peter_n
Veteran
Take a look at the following two PN threads:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00D2Am
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00E1zO&tag=
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00D2Am
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00E1zO&tag=
goo0h
Well-known
Not that my present gallery is all that spectacular, almost all of it was shot with NP1600 at 1600 and more recently 1250. Been using XTOL using pretty close to the numbers listed at the Massive Dev Chart. Since I'm rather green at developing, I tend to use the tag feature of flickr to track what I did. However, please note that I'm currently using an Epson 2450 scanner, so detail a bit soft.
bob irvin
Member
VictorM.
Well-known
I used the film for a job early in my career and really liked it. I rated it at 1200, after some experimentation, and had a lab process and contact it to save time. Now I prefer Delta 3200 at 1600 (mostly 120 in a Rolleiflex).
sherm
Well-known
Thanks everyone!!!!! Looks like I'll have to pick some up tomorrow if I can get out of my driveway here in Austin.
Supposed to have ICE tonight and that's just no fun here in the South :bang:
Thanks again
Scott
Supposed to have ICE tonight and that's just no fun here in the South :bang:
Thanks again
Scott
BILLC
Established
Not fun in the north either.
Bill
Bill
goo0h
Well-known
No, it's not.sherm said:Supposed to have ICE tonight and that's just no fun here in the South :bang:
thafred
silver addict
Hi,
I´ll second Neopan1600 in T-Max developer! great combo with good tones:
If you an get the Rollei chemistry go and try the RHS developer with Neopan or other faster Films...highly recommended for speed and sharpnes!
A buddy of mine developes N1600 in Rodinal 1:50 and has got really nice negs with sharp grain and very good detail.
Search the Tag Neopan1600prof @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ocularis/ excellent photos too
I´ve other examples under the tag Neopan1600 at my Flickr
enjoy this fast contrasty juwel!
I´ll second Neopan1600 in T-Max developer! great combo with good tones:

If you an get the Rollei chemistry go and try the RHS developer with Neopan or other faster Films...highly recommended for speed and sharpnes!

A buddy of mine developes N1600 in Rodinal 1:50 and has got really nice negs with sharp grain and very good detail.
Search the Tag Neopan1600prof @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ocularis/ excellent photos too
I´ve other examples under the tag Neopan1600 at my Flickr
enjoy this fast contrasty juwel!
Nokton48
Veteran
I just reordered two more 100 foot rolls of Neopan Super Presto 1600 from Dirk at www.unicircuits.com That's bulk Neopan 1600, and the film is still available from Fuji in Japan, although the bulk rolls will be discontinued shortly
This time I elected to go with the economy shipping 3-4 week delivery.
kaiyen
local man of mystery
oh no! Megaperls is out of the 1600 bulk, it appears. argh. now I'm not sure what to try...
allan
allan
drewbarb
picnic like it's 1999
I don't want to start any wars, here either, but I like Neopan 400 shot at E.I. of 1600 and processed in Microphen (straight). It has full detail across the range. In fact, it looks so good, I don't carrying faster film. I just use 400 speed film, and adjust my E.I. and processing regimen to suit the light. Depending upon the chemistry, temp, and needs I get good printable negatives at E.I. 200 through 1600, carrying one emulsion. SOMETIMES, if I'm feeling fancy, or just HAVE too, I will even change speed mid-roll. I shoot an empty frame, remembering which one, and cut the roll in the darkroom later, against a template I made. This is getting silly, though, and it's far easier to shoot the whole roll at on E.I.- but I digress...
I am currently without a scanner, or I'd post some examples, (and I'm an obsessive printer; I really like to show prints rather than digital images); but I'll see what I can do if anyone is interested.
I am currently without a scanner, or I'd post some examples, (and I'm an obsessive printer; I really like to show prints rather than digital images); but I'll see what I can do if anyone is interested.
goo0h
Well-known
If you can manage it sometime, I'd sure like to see the results. How's the contrast of NP400 pushed to 1600?drewbarb said:I don't want to start any wars, here either, but I like Neopan 400 shot at E.I. of 1600 and processed in Microphen (straight).
....
I am currently without a scanner, or I'd post some examples, (and I'm an obsessive printer; I really like to show prints rather than digital images); but I'll see what I can do if anyone is interested.
peter_n
Veteran
There will be more. Fuji is not discontinuing production until March.kaiyen said:oh no! Megaperls is out of the 1600 bulk, it appears. argh. now I'm not sure what to try...
allan
Biggles
My cup runneth amok.
My heart just stopped. Thought for a minute you were saying they were discontinuing the emulsion altogether.
(Pulls himself togther)
Ahem.
Apart from the odd roll of Neopan 400 I carry for bokeh emergencies, the 1600's the only stuff I use.
I've seen any number of beautiful, subtle pictures taken with Neopan 1600 by actual competent photographers, and I like the way it renders tonal changes. In my hands, though, I find it's contrasty as hell, and absolutely opaque when over-exposed, but I adore those results.
In my hands, it's cartoony. Soot and ashes.
(Lens was a Leitz 40mm Summicron-C. As if I didn't already have enough contrast issues...)
(Pulls himself togther)
Ahem.
Apart from the odd roll of Neopan 400 I carry for bokeh emergencies, the 1600's the only stuff I use.
I've seen any number of beautiful, subtle pictures taken with Neopan 1600 by actual competent photographers, and I like the way it renders tonal changes. In my hands, though, I find it's contrasty as hell, and absolutely opaque when over-exposed, but I adore those results.

In my hands, it's cartoony. Soot and ashes.
(Lens was a Leitz 40mm Summicron-C. As if I didn't already have enough contrast issues...)
kaiyen
local man of mystery
Peter.,
Thakns for the info. I am pretty happy with my current high speed options, but wanted to give NP1600 at least a try. I'll keep an eye out.
Biggles - sorry about that. The ceasing of production of NP1600 BULK
was announced a while ago, I was just slow in reacting. I can imagine how that would freak someone out.
allan
Thakns for the info. I am pretty happy with my current high speed options, but wanted to give NP1600 at least a try. I'll keep an eye out.
Biggles - sorry about that. The ceasing of production of NP1600 BULK
allan
peter_n
Veteran
Cracking photo Biggles!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.