whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
Anyone using this? Available in the US?
hans voralberg
Veteran
Keith is a Neopan addict and expert, I occasionally use it in 120, what are you looking for ?
And yeah Freestyle stocks it.
And yeah Freestyle stocks it.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Keith is a Neopan addict and expert, I occasionally use it in 120, what are you looking for ?
And yeah Freestyle stocks it.
Not sure about expert but addict ... yes!
However ... 400CN is for C41 processing (minilab) and I've never used it ... Freestyle don't sell it and I've just checked B&H and they don't stock it either.
Apparently it's readily available in England where I've read that it's actually made for Fuji by Ilford ... which means it would likely be XP2. It seems odd that this would be the case but I have read that theory on several occasions here and elsewhere. Can this be confirmed by anyone?
infrequent
Well-known
there is a flickr thread suggesting that neopan cn is virtually xp2 except with an even greater speed latitude. apparently ilford even produce this for fuji and its UK only. of course xp2 is divine. i would love to try some...wondering if any RFF UK members would like to help out! ; )
whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
Maybe we could start a trade idea here with a member overseas.
I ordered some in from Robert White in the UK; as a long-time user of Ilford's chromogenic I was very interested to see what the Fuji-branded film was like. I cannot tell it apart from XP-2 Super. This identity was confirmed to me by one who knows but cannot say so in public.Apparently it's readily available in England where I've read that it's actually made for Fuji by Ilford ... which means it would likely be XP2. It seems odd that this would be the case but I have read that theory on several occasions here and elsewhere. Can this be confirmed by anyone?
It is an odd marketing fact that the Fuji-branded film is available in XP-2's home market but not in the US. Seems very odd to me, but I'm glad to think that Ilford is making money on it too.
R
rich815
Guest
From what I've read not long after it came out is that is practically indistinguishable from XP2. I would not waste your time or pay anything extra for it.
I never heard that Ilford made it for Fuji but that Fuji created it in cooperation with Ilford.
I never heard that Ilford made it for Fuji but that Fuji created it in cooperation with Ilford.
Wahoo
Washing on Siegfried Line
i would love to try some...wondering if any RFF UK members would like to help out! ; )
What exactly do you want ? The last bunch that I received was dated March 2010 (very fresh) and about £2.25 a 36 roll.
infrequent
Well-known
actually i would prefer xp2. but neopan cn might be worth trying. have sent a PM.
Wahoo
Washing on Siegfried Line
actually i would prefer xp2. but neopan cn might be worth trying.
Consider that I shall need to order these films you can have which ever you wish = delay, this will take some weeks to arrive at your place.
Here's the price per roll in UK, plus of course shipping to your destination.
paypal preferred.
XP2 Super 135 - 36 £2.35
Neopan 400 CN 135 - 36 £2.25
Kodak 400 CN 135 - 36 £1.99
Robin P
Well-known
After some research (see APUG) to confirm that it is more or less the same as XP2, I bought 10 rolls of 120 and was disappointed to find that the backing paper numbers are so faint as to be invisible in the red window of old cameras (where the exposure latitude would make it a most useful film). Apparently this is an Ilford trait that I had not previously known about as I'd only used Kodak & Fuji 120 films before.
Cheers, Robin
Cheers, Robin
infrequent
Well-known
@wahoo - that sounds like a steal! i will PM you sometime next week. rough idea about shipping to oz?
Roger Hicks
Veteran
It is coated for Fuji by Ilford.
This leaves three possibilities.
It may be the same
It may be better
It may be inferior
Why would Ilford make a better product for a rival than they sell under their own name, and why would Fuji buy an inferior film to XP2?
This rather indicates that it is probably the same...
Cheers,
Roger
This leaves three possibilities.
It may be the same
It may be better
It may be inferior
Why would Ilford make a better product for a rival than they sell under their own name, and why would Fuji buy an inferior film to XP2?
This rather indicates that it is probably the same...
Cheers,
Roger
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.