Neopan SSS 200 and Kodak Panatomic-X from 1980’s !!!!

G

Guest

Guest
Well because of this pandemic I have been doing some clearing out, found some 120 rolls from around 1989 and now I have this 35 mm lot from the same era.
Can not find any developing times for using Adox Rodinal, does not recognize these two films, so here are the details of them HELP PLEASE.

First description....

Fuji Neopan SSS ULTRA HIGH SPEED 35 mm ASA 200 Black and White.

Second one......

Kodak PANATOMIC-X 35mm 32 ASA Black and White.

Anyone have any knowledge, I think I bought them in England before I moved over to the United States in 1990.
So over to you the experts.
Cheers,
James.
 
It should be easy to find times for the wonderful and popular Panatomic-X. The SSS is much more rare.


However, the published times will usually be for fresh film, and you can hardly expect such old film to behave the same. My guess is that you'll have more luck with the Panatomic-X, being a slower film and being Kodak, whose films have been robust in my experience (old Tri-X for example).
 
A year or two ago I found a Watson bulk loader in my attic loaded with Plus-X with an expiration date of 1999. Now I had moved around a lot and moved into this house in 2008. Anyway I'm in NC, close to Myrtle Beach and the attic in summer must hit around 140 Deg F. So the film wasn't only old it had been in the worse storage condition possible. Anyway there must have been close to the original 100 ft roll in the loader. I developed in D-76 for the recommended Kodak time with maybe a little more agitation than normal. every roll came out great. Point being start with the recommend time and then adjust as necessary. Pan-X D:76 5 minutes. D76 1:1 7 minutes. i also have HC-110 & Microdol-X times.
 
Shoot the SSS bracketed at 50, 100, 200 and develop a clip of film in HC110. Start with 6 or 7 minutes in dilution B. Strongly recommend HC110 for expired film, particularly medium and high speed film.

Pan-X in my experience ages sufficiently slowly that you can shoot and develop it the same as when it was new.

Marty
 
A year or two ago I found a Watson bulk loader in my attic loaded with Plus-X with an expiration date of 1999. Now I had moved around a lot and moved into this house in 2008. Anyway I'm in NC, close to Myrtle Beach and the attic in summer must hit around 140 Deg F. So the film wasn't only old it had been in the worse storage condition possible. Anyway there must have been close to the original 100 ft roll in the loader. I developed in D-76 for the recommended Kodak time with maybe a little more agitation than normal. every roll came out great. Point being start with the recommend time and then adjust as necessary. Pan-X D:76 5 minutes. D76 1:1 7 minutes. i also have HC-110 & Microdol-X times.

My vote is for D76. I used Panatomic-X - it, Plus-X and the old Tri-X were the legendary trio in Kodak's arsenal of black-and-white films until they were sadly discontinued, one by one - and since its discontinuation in the late '80s, have been collecting it as and wherever I can find it. Recently l lucked into an affordable treasure-trove of almost 100 rolls of 120 and 35 of 35mm which, along with those stocks of it I already have (including two 100-foot rolls, still sealed and boxed) will, I hope, see me through with my fine-art shooting to that sad day when I put my film cameras on a shelf for the last time.

Panatomic-X seems to age well and like good wine, produces superb images even decades after its textbook expiry date. These days I acknowledge its 'vintage' by varying its EI speed slightly, 25 in sunshine and 20 on overcast days. I also pull the development by 15% in a Jobo. The negatives I get both print and scan with excellent results.

Kodak films are amazing. Last year I paid A$25 at an Australian flea market for a 100' can of Tri-X which shot at 250 and 320 shows no sign at all of any fog. Who knows where it was kept - most likely at the bottom of some long-gone photographer's freezer. Such finds are a blessing to we older photogs who rely on outdated film for a lot of our analog shooting, especially here in Australia where new film costs have gone through the proverbial roof.

I shot Neopan SS 100 in the late '90s-early '00s and may still have a few rolls left at the bottom of my film freezer at home. I must really go fossicking in there to see what I'll find - not too much Kodachrome, I hope. For me it (Neopan) produced good results with not too much grain with D76. Try a roll and see.

If it helps, I processed all my films with D76 diluted 1-1 and usually for the recommended Kodak times -15%-20%,, but of course YMMV. You may want to 'sacrifice' a test roll or two rolls and vary your exposures and EI settings, it will be worth it.
 
I shot Neopan SS 100 in the late '90s-early '00s and may still have a few rolls left at the bottom of my film freezer at home

This is SSS 200 not SS 100 - they are quite different films, and SSS was discontinued much earlier when Fuji produced their first 400 speed B&W film (I can't remember if it was called Neopan but I think it was) in the late 1980s. And Fuji films don't age as well as older Kodak films. Pan-X was in part discontinued because of all sorts of cool but nasty stuff that, among other things, maintains its speed and latent images in storage.

Particularly if storage might be a problem, I really suggest trying HC-110. Apart from anything it looks good with SSS, but the combination of strong developing agents and lots of restrainers works better than anything for expired film.

Marty
 
ozmoose ^^^^^ Two 100 foot rolls and 100 rolls of 120 and 135 of Panatomic-x. Lucky guy.
I recently bought 13 rolls of 120, and I thought I was lucky. Lovely film. Would likely be my favorite of all time, if I had favorites.
 
Back
Top Bottom