squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
35/1.4
40/1.2
65/2 Macro
All in FE mount
Can Fuji XF be far behind?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/239679...velopment-of-three-voigtlander-e-mount-lenses
40/1.2
65/2 Macro
All in FE mount
Can Fuji XF be far behind?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/239679...velopment-of-three-voigtlander-e-mount-lenses
gavinlg
Veteran
I was just drooling over these before. Especially the two faster/wider ones. I think it might be time to pick up a Sony a7 simply for these voigtlanders.
I don't forsee cosina doing the same lenses for XF mount - the crop factor really kills it.
I don't forsee cosina doing the same lenses for XF mount - the crop factor really kills it.
SaveKodak
Well-known
That 40/1.2 and the A7R2 are freaking perfect. Hell yes Voigtlander.
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
Wish they'll make 40/1.2 in M mount. Looks very compact for an F1.2 lens.
Yokosuka Mike
Abstract Clarity
I saw these lenses yesterday at the CP+ Camera & Imaging Show in Yokohama. They're all beautiful; I was particularly taken with the 40mm f1.2, compact, solid, needs to be on my camera ASAP!
BillBingham2
Registered User
I wonder how long it will be before we see a version VI of the 15mm for the E-mount?
Still kicking myself for not grabbing that used A7 at a reasonable price here on the classifieds a week ago.....
B2 (;->
Still kicking myself for not grabbing that used A7 at a reasonable price here on the classifieds a week ago.....
B2 (;->
FrozenInTime
Well-known
The 40/1.2 is interesting:
Unlike they are saying for the 35/1.4 ; not a reformulation of the M lens - so the bokeh could be quite different ; if it's smooth and the lens does not breath, the lens could be great for stills and video.
Unlike they are saying for the 35/1.4 ; not a reformulation of the M lens - so the bokeh could be quite different ; if it's smooth and the lens does not breath, the lens could be great for stills and video.
Share: