New digital rangefinder

D

Dwight

Newbie
Local time
4:17 AM
Joined
Sep 7, 2003
Messages
6
I understand that some European camera stores are already accepting orders of the new Leica/Panasonic for delivery in January. I haven't seen this camera on any US dealer's web site. Does anyone know where I can order this camera? I hear that the Leica version is twice as expensive as the all-black Panasonic. (900 Euros for Panasonic, 1800 for Leica.) I'll be getting the Panasonic.

http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_440.html
 
I don't think this is a 'digital rangefinder'.

Apart from the LCD screen on the back it looks like a digital viewfinder and nothing rangefinderish about it.

It's pretty though.
 
Dwight said:
Your probably right. On the other hand, why are the Contax G1 and G2 considered to be rangefinders?
Click to expand...

That's a very good point. I have never used a G1 or G2, but I understand that they do use a 'rangefinder' type system to auto-focus, even if the user doesn't see it happening and there is no rangefinder patch (coincident image thingie). The digital cameras, as I understand it, either use active or passive auto-focus, which largely uses contrast (I could be very wrong here) to judge when a subject is in focus. Thus, it does not 'range find' as it does not properly know how far away the subject is - nor does it care. It just knows that highest contrast means 'in focus'.

I have often wondered when some enterprising soul is going to offer an ultra-miniature digital sensor / kit that can be dropped into the back of many classic rangefinders. If you removed the pressure plate on the back, you'd have maybe a 1/4 inch to play with, and the place where the film went could hold batteries, electronics, etc. I dunno. Might be fun.

But you're right in the sense that the 'line' where rangefinders end is a bit blurry (pun intended).

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Hicks and Schultz, in their recent book "Rangefinder" make a point of including "Direct View" cameras, but still making a clear distinction. Which is that Direct View as a category actually includes rangefinders as a sub-category but also includes cameras with non-focusing viewfinders. They go on to use the "Direct View" term when "rangefinder" isn't descriptive.

I agree, Bill, that it could be tricky to draw the line. Maybe "rangefinder" should include any device that measures subject distance without ground-glass focusing? And without reflex TTL viewing?

The drop-in digital module has been considered. An attractive idea for sure, but may not be feasible. Yet? Here's a link: http://www.siliconfilm.com/
 
Doug said:
Hicks and Schultz, in their recent book "Rangefinder" make a point of including "Direct View" cameras, but still making a clear distinction. Which is that Direct View as a category actually includes rangefinders as a sub-category but also includes cameras with non-focusing viewfinders. They go on to use the "Direct View" term when "rangefinder" isn't descriptive.

I agree, Bill, that it could be tricky to draw the line. Maybe "rangefinder" should include any device that measures subject distance without ground-glass focusing? And without reflex TTL viewing?

The drop-in digital module has been considered. An attractive idea for sure, but may not be feasible. Yet? Here's a link: http://www.siliconfilm.com/
Click to expand...

That's a pretty cool link, thanks! I agree, the technology is not quite there yet (or maybe the interest is what's lacking). Maybe someday..sigh.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom