New images in my gallery - latest Tri-X roll

[alexz]

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=8408

You're most welcomed to check the latest 11 images in my gallery - from my latest, recently developed Tri-X roll. Souped in HC-110, dill H, 20 deg. C for 13 minutes

your opinions are welcome...

Alex

 

[photogdave]

Hi Alex,
Some nice shots there. Good use of foreground framing and shadows.
Not to be negative, but I sometimes wish members wouldn't upload so many images to the gallery at one time. We all want our shots to be seen but when a couple of people put up a whole big group of shots after someone has just posted one or two, the one or two get lost quickly.
However, you have some really nice work in your gallery. Keep it up! 🙂

 

[charjohncarter]

Very good, Alex, what did you rate the ISO of this roll of Tri-X? I think you were leaning toward 400 the last time we 'talked.' Is this how these were exposed?

 

[alexz]

Thank you guys. No problem, understood, will be remembering to "delute" by images upload to shorter series.

John, all these were shot @ nominal: ISO 400. After the ring-around test I did on Tri-X lately, I decided to stick with nominal 400 for rolls when a variety of lighting is expected thoughout the roll (say, some are at daylight outdoors, some other frames - indoors, another few on the same roll - under evening sky...).
However, when I expect consistent session at high contrast lighting (entire roll of Tri-X goes for, say, a few hours-long daylight session with bright skies) - I'll rate it 200 and underdevelop.