DougK
This space left blank
Many of you have probably seen this already, but MiNT has another Instax film-based project in the works, this time a rangefinder camera called the InstantKon SF70 that uses the square Instax films.
The link to the project page is https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mintcamera/instantkon-sf70-instant-camera.
I have to admit that I'm sorely tempted. I used to have a Polaroid pack film camera that was great fun to play with (and oh, the lovely negatives you got along with the print...).
The link to the project page is https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mintcamera/instantkon-sf70-instant-camera.
I have to admit that I'm sorely tempted. I used to have a Polaroid pack film camera that was great fun to play with (and oh, the lovely negatives you got along with the print...).
Last edited:
zuiko85
Veteran
Wow! What a great idea, it......wait.....oh, it’s Kickstarter.
Never mind.
Never mind.
DougK
This space left blank
Considering the company has been around for 10 years at this point and has produced a number of other cameras, I'd say the risk is much lower than other Kickstarter projects.
Corran
Well-known
I wouldn't spend this much on camera to only shoot Instax. But why can't they make this take 120 film (as well)??
And come off it with the Kickstarter bashing. Plenty of excellent success stories there. With some discernment one can be fairly sure about getting what they pledge for. Personally I've done over a dozen Kickstarters - for instance the Diana Instant Square camera I have been using a lot this month.
And come off it with the Kickstarter bashing. Plenty of excellent success stories there. With some discernment one can be fairly sure about getting what they pledge for. Personally I've done over a dozen Kickstarters - for instance the Diana Instant Square camera I have been using a lot this month.
DougK
This space left blank
I agree, I've only had 1 Kickstarter project out of 11 fail to ship on time (and technically it was an Indiegogo project that was canceled, so no money lost). Go with a company that has a proven track record, or someone who has previous product launch experience and knows how to set realistic goals, and you'll usually be OK.I wouldn't spend this much on camera to only shoot Instax. But why can't they make this take 120 film (as well)??
And come off it with the Kickstarter bashing. Plenty of excellent success stories there. With some discernment one can be fairly sure about getting what they pledge for. Personally I've done over a dozen Kickstarters - for instance the Diana Instant Square camera I have been using a lot this month.
As to the camera, I think I've talked myself off the ledge. Great idea, but I'm not sure that I'm a big enough fan of instant film to make the investment worthwhile.
Archlich
Well-known
Its predecessor, the RF70, has been out for like 2 years. Little fear of them not being able to deliver the new one.
This looks more refined, especially the grip. Hope they fixed the very soft lens.
This looks more refined, especially the grip. Hope they fixed the very soft lens.
zuiko85
Veteran
Problem with Kickstarter is that when a project fails, or is way behind schedule, or ships a crappy or defective product, there is zero mechanism in place for backers to recover their money. Please let me repeat that in another way, the project creators have no responsibility except a moral one to make right broken promises. If they decide to ignore backer pleas for refund or satisfaction there is absolutely no ‘practical’ legal recourse available to backers.
But, you are right in that Mint has been around for a while and is not an unknown......still, they do already have your money if a person signs up.
One project out of 11 fail to ship on time! That’s unusual. Backed 4 hardware projects with a 50% failure rate. Total failure on one and partial failure on the Travelwide handheld 4x5 (the helical never worked, got tighter and tighter and locked up, but the rest of the body has been adapted to a Rube Goldberg contraption that will shoot 94X94 square images with 4x5 holders.
So, I’m now somewhat more risk averse and if I really like an idea will just have to wait and see how it turns out.
Actually, this seems a bit overpriced.
But, you are right in that Mint has been around for a while and is not an unknown......still, they do already have your money if a person signs up.
One project out of 11 fail to ship on time! That’s unusual. Backed 4 hardware projects with a 50% failure rate. Total failure on one and partial failure on the Travelwide handheld 4x5 (the helical never worked, got tighter and tighter and locked up, but the rest of the body has been adapted to a Rube Goldberg contraption that will shoot 94X94 square images with 4x5 holders.
So, I’m now somewhat more risk averse and if I really like an idea will just have to wait and see how it turns out.
Actually, this seems a bit overpriced.
DougK
This space left blank
You make some good points and I agree with you regarding the risks. I tend to focus on projects from companies that already exist and are trying new concepts or have a proven track record of delivering, but there's no denying that I've been quite fortunate.Problem with Kickstarter is that when a project fails, or is way behind schedule, or ships a crappy or defective product, there is zero mechanism in place for backers to recover their money. Please let me repeat that in another way, the project creators have no responsibility except a moral one to make right broken promises. If they decide to ignore backer pleas for refund or satisfaction there is absolutely no ‘practical’ legal recourse available to backers.
But, you are right in that Mint has been around for a while and is not an unknown......still, they do already have your money if a person signs up.
One project out of 11 fail to ship on time! That’s unusual. Backed 4 hardware projects with a 50% failure rate. Total failure on one and partial failure on the Travelwide handheld 4x5 (the helical never worked, got tighter and tighter and locked up, but the rest of the body has been adapted to a Rube Goldberg contraption that will shoot 94X94 square images with 4x5 holders.
So, I’m now somewhat more risk averse and if I really like an idea will just have to wait and see how it turns out.
Actually, this seems a bit overpriced.
I considered backing the Travelwide because I loved the idea (and still do), but ultimately decided that there was little point in getting a 4x5 that didn't offer movements. Sounds like I might have dodged a bullet on that one.
Corran
Well-known
Nah. I had a Travelwide and it worked flawlessly. It's not designed for tripod, movement-heavy uses, obviously, but it was a nice camera. Too bad I got screwed by offering to help the community machine some replacement parts and the machinist I think died and my camera disappeared, forever.
Anyway, of course there is a reason for the company to produce a good product - continued sales and good standing in the community. This may or may not come into play depending, but obviously with a known company it does.
Anyway, of course there is a reason for the company to produce a good product - continued sales and good standing in the community. This may or may not come into play depending, but obviously with a known company it does.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
How much different is it from already available https://mint-camera.com/en/shop/cameras/instantkon-rf70/
I'm not sure about lens been soft, I think, Instant film from FujiFilm doesn't support high resolution.
I have tried to recover negatives from Polaroids. Basically it is same experience, chemicals, smell as from cleaning toilet bowl.
I'm not sure about lens been soft, I think, Instant film from FujiFilm doesn't support high resolution.
I have tried to recover negatives from Polaroids. Basically it is same experience, chemicals, smell as from cleaning toilet bowl.
Archlich
Well-known
How much different is it from already available https://mint-camera.com/en/shop/came...stantkon-rf70/
I'm not sure about lens been soft, I think, Instant film from FujiFilm doesn't support high resolution.
Seems that the new one use the Instax Square paper and for the RF70, which was larger and heavier, the Instax Wide paper.
The lens was really soft wide open. Visibly softer than the top range Instax Wide cameras with AF.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.