maddoc
... likes film again.
That is quite some money for the release of an old lens design. What did Leica invent to justify the high price, special glass or optical design?
I like it.
And yes, if I had the money I'd buy it.
HP5, M4-P, wrist strap. All in my jacket pocket.
And in my pants pocket, Leica's tabletop tripod.
That is quite some money for the release of an old lens design. What did Leica invent to justify the high price, special glass or optical design?
Is it? It is a recalculation of the original formula, new coatings and the old mechanical design to modern specifications. The price is about the same (in Euros) as the cheapest 28 in Leica's lineup, the Elmarit, which is part of the Summarit lens group, intended as entry-level.That is quite some money for the release of an old lens design. What did Leica invent to justify the high price, special glass or optical design?
The price is about the same (in Euros) as the cheapest 28 in Leica's lineup, the Elmarit, which is part of the Summarit lens group, intended as entry-level.
That is quite some money for the release of an old lens design. What did Leica invent to justify the high price, special glass or optical design?
and not much more expensive than an Orion-15
I have owned the Elmarit and I could not discern any build quality differences to the Summarits, which I cannot fault either. I did not like the rendering of the lens, though.
Well, I only have experience of the first series when they just came out, and did not see the things you noticed.
I did see one of these at the LHSA meet here in Vancouver about a week ago...We all have the choice to buy or not to buy anyway.
Not at all true. $2K for a very slow lens with its inherent limited functionality is completely beyond my budget. This lens is virtually worthless on a film camera. Another piece of silly bling from the masters of fluff and silliness. How about a special edition version with a ruby stone Leica red dot for $5K?
Has Leica ever been less relevant to photography than it is today? The Monochrom body is the only real innovation Leica has introduced since the M5 and M6, cameras with a built in meter. The M5 was introduced in 1971! I'm not going to bash the M5, because although it was an abject failure in the marketplace in the 1970's, it is a good camera.
The M7 you say? Again, nice camera but AE was available from other camera makers in the 1970's. The M7 was introduced in 2002.
In the 1920's the Barnack camera started a photographic revolution. If Leica would stop pandering to the 1%er crowd, maybe they could develop more timely and innovative products today.