optique
Member
I just purchased a used camera from a fellow forum member, Prav66.
Everything was as he described, with fast fed ex shipping.
I have yet to run film but otherwise the camera looks great.
This is my first rangefinder, so I know there will be a learning curve and a lot of fun.
My interest is b&w landscape. I also shoot an rb67, 35mm and digital.
Thanks.
Steve.
Everything was as he described, with fast fed ex shipping.
I have yet to run film but otherwise the camera looks great.
This is my first rangefinder, so I know there will be a learning curve and a lot of fun.
My interest is b&w landscape. I also shoot an rb67, 35mm and digital.
Thanks.
Steve.
Rafael
Mandlerian
Welcome to the forum Steve. That sounds like a great kit to get you into RF photography.
element6
Newbie
So you are the one?! I eyed that Mamiya 6 but didn't have the cash... Please post your results when available. I would love to see some examples from the camera...
optique
Member
Yeah, I think I might have bought the 6 you saw.
Getting ready to develop shortly.
will advise.
Steve.
Getting ready to develop shortly.
will advise.
Steve.
element6 said:So you are the one?! I eyed that Mamiya 6 but didn't have the cash... Please post your results when available. I would love to see some examples from the camera...
optique
Member
Just developed a roll of Arista edu ultra 400 bw.
Using AE, my photos were uniformly overexposed, but focus seemed sharp.
I need to compare my light meter to the camera setting to see what the deal is.
Too bad I did not have instant gratification, but this is a new camera for me!
Steve.
Using AE, my photos were uniformly overexposed, but focus seemed sharp.
I need to compare my light meter to the camera setting to see what the deal is.
Too bad I did not have instant gratification, but this is a new camera for me!
Steve.
element6 said:So you are the one?! I eyed that Mamiya 6 but didn't have the cash... Please post your results when available. I would love to see some examples from the camera...
JeffGreene
(@)^(@)
optique
Member
Jeff,
That is a seriously nice photo!
I am looking forward to learning my camera, that I got mostly for hiking.
Thanks.
Steve.
That is a seriously nice photo!
I am looking forward to learning my camera, that I got mostly for hiking.
Thanks.
Steve.
JeffGreene said:
Finder
Veteran
optique said:
I use a 6 and 6MF. I always used a handheld meter for determining exposures. I find the camera meter can be way off. The Mamiya RF metering does not have a good reputation.
BTW, my avatar was taken with a 6 in Tibet.
clarence
ダメ
The meter in the Mamiya 6 looks through the finder rather than through the lens. I suspect the design limitation was due to the collapsible lens mount.
If you hold your hand over the finder to shade it, you will notice the difference it makes when metering. I have not yet overexposed a shot, but I have one or two underexposed shots from when the sky occupied a large portion of the frame. Like Finder says, one way of getting around this is to use a handheld meter. I personally prefer using exposure compensation in tricky lighting situations.
Clarence
If you hold your hand over the finder to shade it, you will notice the difference it makes when metering. I have not yet overexposed a shot, but I have one or two underexposed shots from when the sky occupied a large portion of the frame. Like Finder says, one way of getting around this is to use a handheld meter. I personally prefer using exposure compensation in tricky lighting situations.
Clarence
optique
Member
I compared the exposure the 6 came up with, to my Sekonic 358, reflected. I believe the meter is working acceptably.
Once I develop the Delta 100 I took today, I will know more.
Thanks.
Once I develop the Delta 100 I took today, I will know more.
Thanks.
Finder said:
Last edited:
optique
Member
Please take a look at some Epson 4490 scans from my Mamiya 6 negatives. Film was Delta 100.
I know looking at scans is different than looking at prints, but I would appreciate any comments on exposure or focus. Scans are level adjusted only.
Above Mexican figure cropped.
I qm used to shooting my rb, and I am finding that AE exposure on the 6 makes negative that is harder to print. As others have said, I guess I will have to rely on a meter.
A comment about the way the camera works: Why is it that the camera can detect that the lens cap is on, but still let's you take a shot? Edit: I thought the camera could detect this, but evidently it can not. Question retracted.
Any and all comments appreciated.
Thanks
Steve.
I know looking at scans is different than looking at prints, but I would appreciate any comments on exposure or focus. Scans are level adjusted only.
Above Mexican figure cropped.
I qm used to shooting my rb, and I am finding that AE exposure on the 6 makes negative that is harder to print. As others have said, I guess I will have to rely on a meter.
A comment about the way the camera works: Why is it that the camera can detect that the lens cap is on, but still let's you take a shot? Edit: I thought the camera could detect this, but evidently it can not. Question retracted.
Any and all comments appreciated.
Thanks
Steve.
Last edited:
clarence
ダメ
The scans look great. They are very high contrast, which is how I like it. I've heard that slightly overexposed negatives are often difficult to print but make excellent scans. Perhaps that is the case here.
Clarence
Clarence
sf
Veteran
Hi, Steve. Nice choice of gear. The Mamiya 6 is highly regarded for many reasons. It is nice to see another MF RF user join.