New Meyer Optik Biotar 58 f1.5 II lens

I'm always interested to see new manual-focus lenses available in modern lens mounts.

What I want to see is a 28mm manual-focus, wide-angle prime, with a depth-of-field/DOF scale on the barrel, in Canon EF mount!

Wide-angle primes of this description in shorter focal lengths would also be appreciated.

I find manual-focus lenses with DOF scales especially useful for wide-angle applications because, for such focal lengths, I rarely focus on a specific subject, rather I focus on an area. Also, a manual focus lens can use a wider focusing arc, allowing for better spacing of the DOF scale markings.

- Murray
 
The revised lenses do seem interesting, notwithstanding the scandal of the 1st versions. I'd be tempted it they were coupled; it's not as if they're cheap items. I wonder what's the big deal making these lenses RF-coupled? Even PRC-based junksters seem able to do so without issue.
 
The revised lenses do seem interesting, notwithstanding the scandal of the 1st versions. I'd be tempted it they were coupled; it's not as if they're cheap items. I wonder what's the big deal making these lenses RF-coupled? Even PRC-based junksters seem able to do so without issue.

I totally agree - seems like a big miss not rangefinder coupling these. For an extra few hundred dollars, it would be worth it. I’m never going to shoot an uncoupled M Mount lens.
 
These also seem to be available in lots of other mounts--Canon, Nikon, Pentax (both K and M-42). I agree that non coupled f/1.5 lenses for a Leica RF film camera are a non-starter, but SLR users might find them useable, if they want that look from their lenses. I personally don't, and wouldn't pay anywhere near that price, but the company clearly thinks that some people will.
 
For an SLR I‘d just get a Helios for the fraction of the price of that Biotar. A coupled rf lens would be interesting though…
 
Whoa! An M42 version? Wonder if they have aperture pins. The 58mm only has a 0.75m min focus? That's kind of crazy. The Triopan II 35mm f/2.8 looks pretty interesting. Good, modern 35mm FL lenses in M42 are hard to come by - just the Zeiss ZS and the VC 40mm.
 
I like the M-42 option also. Tempting.

Darn- the one of most interest, Lydith 30mm f3.5 is not offered in M42. The Biotar 75mm f1.5 also sounds interesting. Not sure I would pay a grand for any triplet lens.
 
I like the M-42 option also. Tempting.

Darn- the one of most interest, Lydith 30mm f3.5 is not offered in M42. The Biotar 75mm f1.5 also sounds interesting. Not sure I would pay a grand for any triplet lens.

I mean, when you look at what people are paying for the OG 75mm Biotar, it is not so expensive. 🙂.
 
I like the M-42 option also. Tempting.

Darn- the one of most interest, Lydith 30mm f3.5 is not offered in M42. The Biotar 75mm f1.5 also sounds interesting. Not sure I would pay a grand for any triplet lens.

I am a big fan of the Lydith 30mm f3.5 lens and would welcome a new version of that lens.
 
Back
Top Bottom