johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
New! New! NEW!
New lenses?
There's nothing wrong with my old ones, no thank you.

New lenses?
There's nothing wrong with my old ones, no thank you.
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
I know that Minolta contracted out some zoom lenses to Tokina, and perhaps others, in the 1980s. As I understand it, the lenses had Minolta's coatings,
Both Tokina and Minolta were premium lens makers.
What we have here is a case of a mere virtual distributor, with a activity focus on buying up once popular shareware and converting it to shrink-wrap sales. I have abandoned every piece of my software they touched (e.g. Winzip and Silkytouch) as I disliked the turn their products took after the takeover. I have no reason to believe that they are any better when they deal in hardware...
css9450
Veteran
The box is probably made in Germany...
Armoured
Well-known
I was thinking that 85 looks a lot like the Helios lenses ...
Huss
Veteran
According to wikipedia 90% of the Leica M (240) is made in Portugal... so I don't see any problem in outsourcing or rebranding. The price difference hower is to big...
Yes, but made by Leica in Portugal.
Not made by a Chinese mfg, then relabeled as something from a different mfg.
zuiko85
Veteran
Lomoography pulls the same stunt. They are accepting pre-orders on the "New Russar+", a 20mm f5.6 in LTM.
And all for only $650!
That's crazy when Stephen still has a brand new (but discontinued) CV 21 f4 in LTM for $419 and that includes the viewfinder!
Even if you wanted the new native M mount 21 f4 and metal VF the total price is still less than the Russar+ and the Russar does not include the VF.
And all for only $650!
That's crazy when Stephen still has a brand new (but discontinued) CV 21 f4 in LTM for $419 and that includes the viewfinder!
Even if you wanted the new native M mount 21 f4 and metal VF the total price is still less than the Russar+ and the Russar does not include the VF.
Share: