sepiareverb
genius and moron
At the Steiglitz Steichen & Strand exhibit in NY last week we overheard someone looking at the Steichen Autochromes tell his girlfriend "I've got an App that does that."
Actually, when I was at a coffee shop shooting some of those, a guy asked me why I didn't just use an app to do the same thing.
I told him I had turkey bacon with my egg whites that morning, but that with photography, I preferred not to fake it.
At the moment I find pretty much any film The Impossible Project makes awful (at least what I've seen of it). However, I do hope they manage to improve it and bring it to acceptable levels. If they ever get to the level of the old Polaroid 600 I might buy a pack or two. I love Fuji's packfilm and their Instax film is also quite good but the Instax camera is a bit crappy.
I used to get annoyed by The Impossible Project because I found it insulting that they would sell such a poor product. But then I realised they're such a small company the just can't afford to experiment on their own dime. Buying film forom them at the moment is like buying magazines such as "The Big Issue" in the UK from a homeless person. Sure, technically you're buying something but in reality you know damn well you're giving to charity. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
I used to get annoyed by The Impossible Project because I found it insulting that they would sell such a poor product. But then I realised they're such a small company the just can't afford to experiment on their own dime. Buying film forom them at the moment is like buying magazines such as "The Big Issue" in the UK from a homeless person. Sure, technically you're buying something but in reality you know damn well you're giving to charity. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
I seldom get annoyed at anyone trying to make an honest living. Impossible is not in a position to survive behind the scenes until everyone is satisfied with the final product. I believe they've been brilliant in their approach. The recognize and take advantage of the fact that there is a niche for questionable/unpredictable products in a creative area. They've been up front from the beginning about their product. No one buys it thinking it's 600 or whatever.
There may indeed be some folks who buy it out of charity and love for Polaroid, but I think most are in it because they like the experience and the results.
I think the low fidelity and erratic results are actually what the target audience wants. Why spend money making it sharp and consistent if your niche doesn't care? It will never be mainstream.
Actually, when I was at a coffee shop shooting some of those, a guy asked me why I didn't just use an app to do the same thing.
I told him I had turkey bacon with my egg whites that morning, but that with photography, I preferred not to fake it.
I have a Polaroid One-Step with close up. It is perfect, it was given to me and had some expired and unusable film in it. But they still spit out perfectly.
Any member can have it for the postage.
PM sent about this...
Regards..
Very nice. I used to have a 1967 GTO. What a beast. This new film looks more than promising. I have an SLR 680, will definitely get some.