Hello
I'm following this thread from the start and I'm still amazed by the commitment you have . Making a replica seems in some aspects more difficult than making something that just "look like" . For instance , you seemed to struggle with flare . It reminds me of a discussion with the french Contax importer like 20 years ago explaining to me that Zeiss used up to 14 different anti-reflection black paints to put on the side of lenses , depending on ... a lot of parameters . You'll be outing a screw mount version and I was thinking , why not making this lens like the first original version with removable mount . Or we could just buy the SM version and a Yeenon mount like this one :
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Yeenon-Lei...835100?hash=item3d86c1875c:g:C4gAAOSwHnFVxW1b
( no link with the seller , never seen the product )
In a previous reply , I was suggesting a black matte finish , and you explained to me it was not possible . Any update or no hope ?
Regarding the coating , my wish would be not particularly SC or MC but the hardest one . Do you have an advice on the toughness of the different coatings ?
I don't remember if it's been asked : 6bit coding option or no hope ?
And regarding your next project , the Noctilux 1.2 , I mean , what a challenge ! Do you use the same frightening method by dismounting old ones or a more theorical approach ? Are you afraid of the coupling that seemed problematic back in the day ? I'm personnaly interested in this lens ( tried it once on TMZ long time ago ) because of the unique concept approach : a ( apparently ) simpler optical formula to achieve max clarity no matter the drawbacks ( astigmatism , fine detail sharpness and distortion ) . Will the fidelity to the original go to the unusual 48mm filter thread ?
Please excuse me for my approximate english and for asking so much questions at a time , but eventually it's all your fault
🙂 .
Vincent