[New test photos released] Leica Summicron 35/2 Eight Element copy made in China

A few more samples, processed, from the replica and the M9 Monochrom

50361930547_1d0cf3a620_b.jpg


50361073078_b4d3f13cf1_b.jpg


50361073143_42d2b8e5c0_b.jpg


50361930677_1b32604154_b.jpg


50361072933_75b5c9cba3_b.jpg


50361072888_0ca42941d5_b.jpg
 
Here are some unedited examples, with various focal zones attempted, at f/2. Other apertures available on the link above.

Great shots Ashwin! Honestly, quite franly the lens behaves like a Replica should. It is slightly higher contrast and perhaps there's more light transmission from the Replica. However - they are essentially the same.
 
50335301403_ed875ba760_b.jpg

The Obelisk Near the Lighthouse - Robe, South Australia
Leica M2, Light Lens Lab 35/2 Summicron Replica (164/500), Leitz UVa Filter, Adox CMS 20ii, Rodinal 1:200 @ 60 mins
 
Thanks, Larry, and yes, you are right. I feel that this may be slightly scene dependent, and unfortunately, the boats were not 100% static, so some boat drift may be at play as well...but the lenses are really, really close...and I think you are right about the fall off differences, but I would need to do shoot more scenes where fall off would come into play.

I very much agree with Larry. As I stated in a number of previous posts, the primary difference I've found between the replica and the original 8 Element is the replica has slightly higher contrast, roll off of the OOF is considerably more gradual, so that OOF areas behind the subject appear as though the replica is at least 1 to 1.5 stops more closed down compared to a comparative shot with the original 8 Element. It's consistent and quite notable. The last difference (which may be digital or M9 specific), is the replica even with an amber coating as the original, appears to be cooler in color temp. This last attribute I'm not fully convinced of.

Great comparative shots Shin...well done! I have a bevy of replica images to process using the M9 and a few with the original monochrom.

Dave (D&A)
 
Thanks for the link, Dave. I have not seen it. The replica movement may have to keep it all quiet before Leica finds out!

The prices are crazy, whether this planned one or the original one. Tuition cost in the USA at several private universities can exceed $60k per year, in comparison. Food for thought.
 
Thanks for the link, Dave. I have not seen it. The replica movement may have to keep it all quiet before Leica finds out!

The prices are crazy, whether this planned one or the original one. Tuition cost in the USA at several private universities can exceed $60k per year, in comparison. Food for thought.

Yes, prices are crazy. As spectacular as the replica lens is, I still think there is room and a market for LLL to make a 50mm f1.2 Noct replica and price it accordingly and reasonably. This is especially in light of how good their original replica lens is.

Dave (D&A)
 
Yes, prices are crazy. As spectacular as the replica lens is, I still think there is room and a market for LLL to make a 50mm f1.2 Noct replica and price it accordingly and reasonably. This is especially in light of how good their original replica lens is.

Dave (D&A)

Is a reasonable price $1000-$2000? 😎😀:angel:😱
 
Is a reasonable price $1000-$2000? 😎😀:angel:😱

That's hard to say. I don't know how hard it is to replicate the elements inside the original 50mm f1.2 Noct and then of course if that's successful, replicating it's look and performance as closely as possible. Financially what that would cost, I simply don't know.

Dave (D&A)
 
Managed to get my hands on a LLL hood (and another for a fellow member local to me) and comparing it vs the original IROOA, it has the biggest advantage of being able to take in screw in filters without having to play the juggling game of Lens => Hood => Filter held in by hood

uc


uc
 
maybe this 'edition' is only made for copyright reasons.

Any utility patent associated with the manufacture of the original f1.2 Noctilux has long since expired. Copyright only pertains to items such as books, music, images or computer programs. The trademark for "Noctilux" is valid for as long as Leica keeps using it.
 
Managed to get my hands on a LLL hood (and another for a fellow member local to me) and comparing it vs the original IROOA, it has the biggest advantage of being able to take in screw in filters without having to play the juggling game of Lens => Hood => Filter held in by hood

Where?! How?!
 
Back
Top Bottom