New thread for Bill's problems to keep Joe's thread on topic :)

Bill, lots of good comments and advice for you ( or anyone else ) by a lot of the menbers of the forum already.

I wrote the lines below just after Captainslack's 2nd post. Then got called out of the office until just now. Some have said some of what I was trying to say better than me. Still if any of it is different or said in a different way that makes more sense, here it is. If not, just ignore it gleefully.

For what it's worth, I don't take that many photos any more, other than family snapshots. But, I still find myself looking at them later and realizing I can still do what I used to do, compose well sometimes, without realizing at the time I was doing so. Or I see I used light well that I didn't even notice when I was taking the shot. I don't recall that I ever did that naturally.

I had to look at a lot of my own bad photos to see what needed improving. Then carefully composing to insure I was getting a better composition. Eventually it worked such that I was getting some good ones along with the bad. I learned a lot of other things along the line, by experimenting mostly. I learned how to use light. I learned how to appreciate different lighting. I learned how to paint with light. I learned how to choose different lenses for their effect. I learned how to recognize different lens focal lengths that had been used. I can still do some of those things.

It was sometimes discouraging when I had trouble getting what I wanted, and sometimes I quit trying. Sometimes I went back later and tried again. Sometimes I didn't, and almost always regretted not having done so. Sometimes I almost just had to make myself go back and try something. I always felt better when I did. Even if I still couldn't get quite what I wanted.

But you know, out of all that time when I was at my best, I still got some bad photos. Worse, I still got some really really bad photos. I hated that! I hate that now I don't have (make) the opportunity to take more photos. I often wonder if I should have tried to make photography my living. Truthfully, I used to worry about two things. It might get to be work rather than pleasure, and I might not be good enough. I put those reasons in that order, but probably it was the later that scared me the most. Anyway, I never tried.

I sometimes used to show some of my photos to others, naturally expecting a lot of praise. Sometimes I got it, sometimes not. I still somewhere have a small portfollio of different photos I put together, just to see the reactions. About 12 or 15. Some were interesting, some I didn't much like. Two were of dandelions with bees on them: some of my early experiments with extention tubes. They were without a tripod and dof wasn't well controlled either. Just about everybody who saw them praised them. That's why they were in there. Looking for someone who wouldn't. Some I thought were really great were flipped over with hardly more than a glance. I still haven't figured that out. Phillistines!

I still like to take photos just because I think I saw something interesting that might make a good photo. But I don't do it so much now. When I do, I don't share them so much. I try to be happy at what got if I think I got what I wanted. Of course I usually show them to my family. Especially my daughters. My wife is harder to please.

Lessons (I think I) learned?

If you can sell photos, there should be pleasure in it over and above the money. If there is no pleasure, why do it?

Take all photos for yourself first. Even if for pay. Don't try to be the photographer of everybody. You do some things better than other things. Since at least a part of that is the pleasure you get from that type of photography, try to do that the most. Never however, be afraid to try new things. We grow that way.

Sometimes you have to push yourself to stay with photography. You will almost certainly thank yourself if you do. You will almost certainly hate yourself if you don't.

Don't worry too much what others think of your photos. Sure, it is nice to receive the compliments. But if the photo pleases you, it has pleased the most important person in your life. That doesn't mean you should turn yourself off to criticism. There is always something to be learned from others' critiques. Either they can point out things you didn't notice, and you can use that to improve, or you can recognize tasteless people and learn to ignore them. Either way you are the one who gains.

You mentioned depression. You don't come across in the forum as someone who would likely be depressed. However, that can happen to anybody at any stage of their life. If you even suspect that, talk to a doctor about it. If you have it, it can be treated. If not, take comfort that isn't your problem.

Inability to acheive what you want, especially in something that is art as well as technique can be frustrating. Attack it head on! Experiment. Take more photos. Get people to critique them. Critique the critiques. Your photography has to be yours.

Don't take it too much to heart if everybody isn't jumping up and down praising your photos. Some people really are hard to please. Some have no souls. Some just have other things on their mind than your belief in your own artistic ability. My wife has fibromyalgia. She doesn't see much pleasure in anything but our grandson. No matter what I try.

If you like your photography, don't get disappointed in others. If you don't, find out why and fix it. It's your hobby after all.

Sorry for the long post. Just thought maybe it might get your thinking juices moving in the right direction. Whatever that is.

Cheers.
 
greyhoundman said:
Other than beer, matches and cameras. What is a subject that evokes a passion or intense interest for you personally?

No-Pest Strips and Firearms.

Bowling for Dollars.

Naughty Zoot.

Abandoned Homes & Gardens.

Barbies with Bad Haircuts.

Stuff like that, I guess.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
There you go Bill - Barbies w/ bad haircuts carrying heat... AK-47 derivatives seem appropriate, eh? Or FALs...

Semi-seriously, work on trying to find a way to see a firearm in some way new to you.

Of the things mentioned here, the idea I find most useful is to find a subject, any subject and shoot it till you know where freezes. For me it's old barns, fields & cemetaries; sometimes they works well to me, like the Town of Dunn shots I posted the other day. Mostly not and noone else sees them.

William
 
I want to take photographs like Bukowski wrote. Fast, angry, flowing, common and dark. Real 'belly-of-the-beast' type stuff. But I just don't know how to do that.
 
bmattock said:
I want to take photographs like Bukowski wrote. Fast, angry, flowing, common and dark. Real 'belly-of-the-beast' type stuff. But I just don't know how to do that.


The camera is an expressive tool, whilst composition exposure etc. can be learned what is really important is working out how you feel about the world and then working out how to express that in pictures. Write a short pitch for your project as if you were showing it to an editor. Then come up with some ideas for pictures and compose them into a shot list of say 20 photos then go out and try to shoot those pictures. Most of the stuff I'm proud of has at least some research and thought behind it.
 
bmattock said:
I want to take photographs like Bukowski wrote. Fast, angry, flowing, common and dark. Real 'belly-of-the-beast' type stuff. But I just don't know how to do that.

That would be really interesting. A collection of photos can present, in a sort of syncopated manner, a kind of narrative vision. I imagine Bukowski taking with the utmost urgency pictures of bar brawls and brothels and noisy night joints and men with sweaty faces and drunken smiles of lust and all, a hellish vision of a corrupt world where compassion somehow survives. He would use a cheap point and shoot, no need for optical excellence here. And he would be there to shoot all that.
 
Toby said:
The camera is an expressive tool, whilst composition exposure etc. can be learned what is really important is working out how you feel about the world and then working out how to express that in pictures. Write a short pitch for your project as if you were showing it to an editor. Then come up with some ideas for pictures and compose them into a shot list of say 20 photos then go out and try to shoot those pictures. Most of the stuff I'm proud of has at least some research and thought behind it.

Interesting concept. I'm not sure I can do it, but I'll try. Thanks!

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Breughel comes to mind. Plenty of fire and drink in those paintings as well. 😛
 
bmattock said:
I want to take photographs like Bukowski wrote. Fast, angry, flowing, common and dark. Real 'belly-of-the-beast' type stuff. But I just don't know how to do that.

There you go! Now go about doing it. It'll take some thought and work, but what great achievement doesn't?
 
bmattock said:
I want to take photographs like Bukowski wrote. Fast, angry, flowing, common and dark. Real 'belly-of-the-beast' type stuff. But I just don't know how to do that.

Just don't try to play William Tell with Anne-Marie! 😉
 
This thread is helpfull for me too, just went through an album with shots I took some 20 years ago and at the moment I think I did better when I didn't know as much about cameras, lenses, film and developers as I do today.
 
RML said:
OK, let's use this thread instead of Joe's to discus Bill's problem with his current photography. 🙂

Joe, maybe some Moholy-Nagy can help. At least reading his German language book on photography will cure your illness for a while. 😛

I like that IR photo you posted. Maybe you really should pursue that line. Just be careful not to step over the line and end up wanting to photograph souls leaving a (your?) body upon death. 🙂


Joe posted an IR shot? Where?
 
you're out of sync.

i'd either use my mind to think through it or my feet to try to shoot (cameras) through it.

from your quotes i gather you have read some zen stuff. get a new copy of the i-ching (sp?) and work through it again.
 
back alley said:
you're out of sync.

i'd either use my mind to think through it or my feet to try to shoot (cameras) through it.

from your quotes i gather you have read some zen stuff. get a new copy of the i-ching (sp?) and work through it again.

I keep throwing the sticks, but I come up with Hexagram 23 over and over again. "Breaking apart. No blame."

"No blame, my a**." - Hagbard Celine, Illuminatus!

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Shoot for yourself and no one else... a few years back I finally came to the conclusion that National Geographic was not going to hire me, and I was not going to get my own showing in a major gallery, and that I was not Gallen Rowell, John Shaw, Ansel Admas, George Lepp, or anyone else like them (some might argue, why would I want to be... not the point). About the same time my daughter was born (my first, at the ripe old age of 41), and I came to the conclusion that the best thing I could do with my photographic engergies was to document her life, and what her old man was feeling becoming a father in middle age and watching her grow... I want that blog, and that legacy to be hers when she grows up. It won't do anything for any one of you, and it's not intended to. But that's what drives my shooting now. It doesn't have to be about anyone else but yourself.
 
memphis said:
here ya go bill, takew your vision to this job:

Bring your photography and food styling skills to Adplex, a 25 year, growing, national provider of marketing solutions for retailers. We are hiring a Studio Photographer with food styling experience to work in the photography studio at our Greensboro AdProduction and Print Services Facility in Greensboro, North Carolina. In addition to creating stylized photography for several national grocery store chain's weekly advertising, it would be helpful to be able to assist with clipping paths and color corrections.

Thank you! Sadly, I am color-blind. I think that would be a poor choice for me. But it might be a lot of fun until they figured it out.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Issy said:
Shoot for yourself and no one else... [snip] It doesn't have to be about anyone else but yourself.

I appreciate your point, but I have to be honest - I seek understanding, approval, and communication with someone. Maybe it doesn't have to be a lot of someones, but I can't just do it for myself alone. At least not yet. Maybe I'll reach that point where I truly don't care if anyone else likes my work. I'm trying to use my art to communicate. If I can't communicate via photography, I'd as soon be writing poetry or prose instead.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
The guy who draws the Asterix Cartoons is color-blind too. Didn't stop him from making great cartoons (as long as the plot writer was still alive, the latest Asterix cartoons are something I don't talk about)
 
Back
Top Bottom