It's not the mirror, it's the groundglass. The fine etched surface will help to bring out this pattern so you can see it.
In every single coated lens, this pattern exists to some extent, that's the whole theory of lens coating and how they do, why they do, what they do.
But they are indeed Newton rings since they are diffracted light with alternating bands of light and dark caused by constructive and destructive wavelength interference. The overlaying surface is just not obviously more convex than the underlying one. http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/py106/Diffraction.html
Wouldn't this be separation (either by design or within spec), but not consistent among them?
I think Phil's coating theory is interesting, but that would imply that some MC's are single coated?
I've never seen a difference between either the 40/1.4, or 35/1.4 Nokton SC and MC's even though folks talk about increased shadow detail with the SC, and better flare resistance with the MC versions.
My two 50mm Summicrons and the 35mm Summicron I had all do it under the flourescent twisty bulbs. They are all very sharp lenses, as others have said, its the light causing it, not a lens issue.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.