Timmyjoe
Veteran
Found some pics of the one I had:
Best,
-Tim




Best,
-Tim
Found some pics of the one I had:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Best,
-Tim
Found some pics of the one I had:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Best,
-Tim
PM me the serial number, I wonder if it's the one I sold earlier this summer. I don't think there are that many of them in circulation.
Best,
-Tim
Found some pics of the one I had:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Best,
-Tim
The YF was a nice camera -- I had one -- but I'm less and less sure why people want to try to use these things. As David said, why not just go for a Leica if all you want to do is take pictures? Or for that matter a modern Voigtlander?
Then again, I used to try lots of different cameras too, and it's sort of hard to remember why. I can see the point of collecting -- again, I used to do it, and Frances and I wrote a book about rangefinder and direct vision cameras* -- but I only ever bought or borrowed cameras that I came across by chance. The collector/user interface is probably more easily solved by going for Leicas.
*I find it amusing that there are 6 strongly positive and 3 strongly negative reviews in the link. As one of my editors said, "You're a Marmite writer": Marmite is a spread that people reputedly either love or hate. Those who didn't like it complained basically that it wasn't the book they'd have written; except of course that none of them actually did write anything except poor reviews...
Cheers,
R.
So Cal,
Did it show up? Does the serial number start with 150? Is it pristine?
Best,
-Tim
That's great Cal. Yours was made 312 cameras before the one I had. Mine was in absolute pristine condition also. Wonder if they were just REALLY WELL MADE, or maybe they just DIDN'T GET USED MUCH.
Best,
-Tim