Nice M6/28mm work (link)

David_Manning

Well-known
Local time
5:34 PM
Joined
Jan 13, 2009
Messages
1,590
Location
Aledo, Texas
I've been concentrating on using a 28mm lens as a walk around lens, to get a different perspective (mostly, mentally) from my favorite, the 35mm.

I did some casual searches trying to find good 28mm work. I came across an Italian, Francesco Zizolo (NOOR images), while perusing ONCE magazine (on my iPad).

I emailed him. He wrote me that the feature I asked about was shot on a Leica M6 with a 28mm lens, and that's it. I really liked the work, and the look. I thought I'd pass it along:

http://www.zizola.com/#

On the drop down menus, select Features, then Aral Sea.

Enjoy.

Also, it seems Antonin Kratochvil uses the 28mm, either with a Leica (older work) or with a 5DmkII (currently).
 
Really brilliant work on that one - I'm beginning to think 28mm is the darling focal length of the 35mm format - everything just seems to look 'right' with it.
 
If I remember right, someone mentioned Jason Eskenazi often used a Leica or Nikon with a 28mm on Wonderland. I really like that book.
 
That first shot in the Aral Sea batch is a stunner.

I go back and forth between 28, 35 and 50 as my daily lens. I'll stick with one for a week or two, then it will change. +1 on the American Suburb Winogrand stuff, lots of other great things to read there too.
 
It seems that very skilled photographers can work magic with 28s (e.g., Garry Winogrand, Trent Parke). But I am not impressed with the work with this focal length of "mere mortals." When I review street photography done with Leica 28s on RFF or LFI or flickr, it does not impress me, with most of it screaming "Get way closer." I have pondered whether I should have a 28 or 35 (along with a 50) on a FF RF. I think a 35 will make more sense unless my skill level were to explode.
 
I think 28mm is a sweet-spot lens, used correctly the results are wonderful. This post is very inspiring. My own 28mm photos need work, as I am one of the mere mortals mentioned above. The weather here is cold and wet and the days are short, so it will be a while until I can walk around with a camera. Thanks for inspiring me to have at least one "28mm day" on my next vacation and then do the same during our upcoming spring weekends.
 
It seems that very skilled photographers can work magic with 28s (e.g., Garry Winogrand, Trent Parke). But I am not impressed with the work with this focal length of "mere mortals." When I review street photography done with Leica 28s on RFF or LFI or flickr, it does not impress me, with most of it screaming "Get way closer." I have pondered whether I should have a 28 or 35 (along with a 50) on a FF RF. I think a 35 will make more sense unless my skill level were to explode.

Well stated ... Must AGREE !!

Yes Us 'Mere Mortals'....find a 28 a tad Difficult to use and must remind Myself to get in 'Closer'
I lost Interest in trying to Discipline Myself for that Length
21 was way More Natural to me

Though I do Think YOU would probably Do Very Well

The 28 Elmarit on the M8 (crop factor) is Wonderful
I know You have your sights on an M10 & 35 cron Asph 😉
 
Eskanazi work on "wonderland" i think he uses zuiko 28 and maybe some leicas.

I, my self already tried 28 with ultron...and after a few months, i decided to sell it amd look for a "easier" 35..

With 28, people look smaller on my negative haha..and sometime too close...so i must be one of the contributor on flicker that you " hate" 😉
 
I have periods where I stick a 28 on the camera and don't take it off. I resisted a 28 for a long time. When I use it exclusively, it's a rewarding experience.

I agree that being close is the key, but that's true of any lens. As Capa said, "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough."

4219868133_b02f89dac8_z.jpg


2622044453_9376fb8bb2_z.jpg
 
I do a whole bunch with the 28, and it's been my primary walkaround lens. It's hard to do right and keep doing new things with though, but it does give a bit of extra special sauce and when it works I think it tends to work better than shorter lenses.

Good one to follow on Flickr is 'gumanow'. And of course Winogrand wrote the book on using 28mm in the street.
 
those are really good photos. the get-closer part of using a 28 is hard for me, but the seeing-a-lot-of-things part is easier, and zizola does both things very well.
 
I spent much of last year with a 28 on ff, and 21 on nex. I like it for landscapes, where unlike street type photography, there's rarely a need to "get closer" unless you want to frame something out. For me, this is as wide as I can go and not get obvious distortions.

I used to have a nice 18/3.4 for SLR that also worked as well as the 21 or better, but the last 15/4.5's I used have the obvious wide angle distortions in most shots.

For me, 35 has become like 50's - not quite wide enough, and not quite long enough.

I think that 28 and 75 are probably the ideal 2 lens kit for me. (Or 28ff, and 50 aps-c).
 
Back
Top Bottom