I was wondering if anyone could tell me the difference between these lenses. Except for designation (a red C) and fontface (one slightly larger), the lenses look identical.
No, it doesn't apply to RF lenses. Nikon has used the ".c" twice, though each was to designate different aspects of the lens coatings.
Nikon's F-mount lenses, with the exception of some very special lenses, were all coated from day one (1959). Many years later they began to use multi-layer coatings. As technology improved and competitors (primarily Pentax) began to brag about their multi-coating Nikon began multicoating all of the glass-to-air surfaces in all of their regular production F-mount lenses with a minimum of 7 layers (or was it 8?). When they did this they began to add the ".c" to the end of the lens designation, just after the letter code denoting the number of elements. They stopped the ".c" marking when they also stopped the letter code for the number of elements; at that time multicoating was the industry norm.
Much earlier, when simple single layer coating was leading edge tech, Nikon used the same ".c" designation to mark lenses that were coated to distinguish them from earlier uncoated lenses. Whether they every phased out this marking in their later RF lenses I don't know. It had become passe by the 1959 introduction of the F and wasn't used on the F-mount lenses as all were coated, as stated above.
I was wondering if anyone could tell me the difference between these lenses. Except for designation (a red C) and fontface (one slightly larger), the lenses look identical.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.