nikkormat query

Nikkormat FT3 is for Ai lenses only.

I don't believe that is correct. The FT3 is designed for the AI lenses but there is a little lever by the lense mount that flips out of the way for the non-ai lenses. You then use stop down metering. The FM also works that way.

The preceding model FT2 is the last Nikkormat to use non-AI lenses and also uses the newer non-mercury batteries.

The FTN requires the old style mercury batteries or zinc-air hearing aid batteries or a CRIS adapter.
 
Not much in it, from what I recall. I've had most of 'em (still have a couple) and I don't recall significant differences. Or consider an F with a Brightscreen. Still not a lot of money.

Cheers,

R.
 
Not much in it, from what I recall. I've had most of 'em (still have a couple) and I don't recall significant differences. Or consider an F with a Brightscreen. Still not a lot of money.

Cheers,

R.
Have to agree. The 'mats are fine cameras but the VF is not stellar (but quite usable) at least compared to a meterless prism Nikon F.
 
IIRC the Nikkormat finders all were a bit less bright than the F in its later incarnations or the F2. Back in the day some repair shops would install the F2 screen of choice into Nikkormats. But people that had their EL hacked to their habitual standard screen mostly were heavy (i.e. PJ) users and few modified ELs will have survived - and the super-bright all-microprism F screens often used in these hacks do not work with all lenses. The FE/FM were up to the F2 in screen brightness, and also the first "lesser" Nikons to have user exchangeable screens, so that you can use the even brighter FE2/FM2 screens if you dial in a corresponding ISO compensation - if you are into bright finders in a sub-F-series Nikon these might be a better choice.
 
IIRC the Nikkormat finders all were a bit less bright than the F in its later incarnations or the F2. Back in the day some repair shops would install the F2 screen of choice into Nikkormats - but people that had their EL hacked to their habitual standard screen mostly were heavy (i.e. PJ) users and few modified ELs will have survived. The FE/FM were up to the F2 in screen brightness, and also the first "lesser" Nikons to have user exchangeable screens, so that you can use the even brighter FE2/FM2 screens if you dial in a corresponding ISO compensation.
Having said that a good user Nikon FE/FM is just as sturdy but lighter and has a better screen ( I put a Nikon FM3A screen in my FE) and they cost about the same, but then I have strayed off topic, a little.
 
The Nikkormats don't vary much, model to model, with respect to VF brightness. The modern brighter screens didn't become common until the era of the FM2/FE2/FA.

The FT2 & FT3 are the youngest so will be the least likely to suffer any age related degradation of the prism and mirror silvering. That, combined with the battery issues, make the FT2 the best Nikkormat choice for older non-AI lenses. If I'm not mistaken, the FT2 and FT3 also benefit from using Nikon's FRE (Functional Resisting Element) rather than a carbon variable resistor for the main meter coupling. These don't suffer wear and are less susceptible to dirt.
 
I found the FM and FE screens to be pretty dark back when I was using them. The FM2 and FE2 were, indeed, much brighter. But, for Non-AI lenses, the FT2 is probably the best Nikkormat.
 
I don't believe that is correct. The FT3 is designed for the AI lenses but there is a little lever by the lense mount that flips out of the way for the non-ai lenses. You then use stop down metering. The FM also works that way.

The preceding model FT2 is the last Nikkormat to use non-AI lenses and also uses the newer non-mercury batteries.

The FTN requires the old style mercury batteries or zinc-air hearing aid batteries or a CRIS adapter.

You are correct in all respects! I just checked. Thanks for the correction.
 
The Nikkormats don't vary much, model to model, with respect to VF brightness. The modern brighter screens didn't become common until the era of the FM2/FE2/FA.

The FT2 & FT3 are the youngest so will be the least likely to suffer any age related degradation of the prism and mirror silvering. That, combined with the battery issues, make the FT2 the best Nikkormat choice for older non-AI lenses. If I'm not mistaken, the FT2 and FT3 also benefit from using Nikon's FRE (Functional Resisting Element) rather than a carbon variable resistor for the main meter coupling. These don't suffer wear and are less susceptible to dirt.
Most of the FT's do not have a split image rangefinder, therefore I deem the FT2 the best overall Nikkormat. I have 2 of them. Also as said by others it can use non-Ai as well as the later model lenses.
 
Back
Top Bottom