FanMan
Established
It‘s no big problem, only something that I noticed while using my ZI during the last days. I don‘t think that it has an impact on the quality of the photos taken. However, I only want to share my experience.
When mounting a Nikkor lens onto my FM2 or my F3 I have to insert the lens in the camera body and twist it counterclockwise until it clicks into place. And while twisting the lens I can already feel that the mount begins to hold the lens. After the click I can grasp the lens by its mounting ring and try to turn it: the lens will not move - it sits absolutely firm in the camera body.
With the ZI this is not the case. Even after the click of the lens release button, which tells me that the lens is now mounted, the lens will move a very little bit if I try to turn it further or back. No big deal, but I noticed it. This wobble or loose connection I can feel also when I focus objects in the viewfinder.
So, maybe the F-mount is simply better designed than the M mount.
When mounting a Nikkor lens onto my FM2 or my F3 I have to insert the lens in the camera body and twist it counterclockwise until it clicks into place. And while twisting the lens I can already feel that the mount begins to hold the lens. After the click I can grasp the lens by its mounting ring and try to turn it: the lens will not move - it sits absolutely firm in the camera body.
With the ZI this is not the case. Even after the click of the lens release button, which tells me that the lens is now mounted, the lens will move a very little bit if I try to turn it further or back. No big deal, but I noticed it. This wobble or loose connection I can feel also when I focus objects in the viewfinder.
So, maybe the F-mount is simply better designed than the M mount.