Timmyjoe
Veteran
I mean, I get it, it's fun for me to whip out the F2AS and play 1970s/1980s documentary photographerm, it's fun to bring out the F3P and MD4 combo and play 1980s press photographer
I can understand why someone wants to be "challenged" by using a meterless camera
I've tried it and occasionally, I look at my negatives and think "if I had the F100 and AF lens, I would not have missed the focus that badly"
You're missing the point some of us are trying to make.
I have a fully mechanical film camera (at this time an F2 w/DE-1) that I carry with me at all times. The reason I carry this is because it is rather small (compared to my work cameras D4, D700 w/Grip), is virtually indestructible, needs no batteries or other disposables, and when I see something that catches my eye, it is always there, ready to shoot (and it makes much nicer pictures than my iPhone).
I use a different film camera system for photo documentary work, (at this time an F3HP, FM2n and a few primes, in the past, Leica M's and a few summicrons). The reason I use this is that the camera system is rather basic, pretty bullet-proof, I do my documentary work in B&W, the system is not nearly as intimidating to subjects as my work cameras with their zoom lenses, and the system is so simple to use that I can concentrate on really interacting with the subjects of the work, and almost forget the camera until it is time to make an image. Then I can quickly and gracefully bring the camera up, make an image, and go right back to the interaction with the subjects.
It's about finding a tool that works for you in doing what you are trying to do. At this time, these old film Nikons do the trick.
Best,
-Tim